Table 3.
One-Sample t-test of SIF on the SP and IP tests, according to compliance.
| t | df | p | Bootstrapa of 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| MCR = 0 | |||||
| IP unconditional | 6.222 | 172 | 0.000 | 0.059 | 0.110 |
| IP conditional | 6.197 | 172 | 0.000 | 0.068 | 0.126 |
| SP unconditional | 6.308 | 172 | 0.000 | 0.071 | 0.136 |
| SP conditional | 6.468 | 172 | 0.000 | 0.075 | 0.138 |
| MCR = 1 | |||||
| IP unconditional | 3.851 | 121 | 0.000 | 0.034 | 0.098 |
| IP conditional | 4.587 | 121 | 0.000 | 0.049 | 0.124 |
| SP unconditional | 6.338 | 121 | 0.000 | 0.084 | 0.157 |
| SP conditional | 7.181 | 121 | 0.000 | 0.103 | 0.176 |
| MCR = 2 | |||||
| IP unconditional | 2.891 | 84 | 0.005 | 0.019 | 0.103 |
| IP conditional | 3.244 | 84 | 0.002 | 0.028 | 0.122 |
| SP unconditional | 3.571 | 84 | 0.001 | 0.038 | 0.132 |
| SP conditional | 4.429 | 84 | 0.000 | 0.065 | 0.168 |
| MCR = 3 | |||||
| IP unconditional | 2.121 | 56 | 0.038 | 0.003 | 0.103 |
| IP conditional | 2.796 | 56 | 0.007 | 0.020 | 0.125 |
| SP unconditional | 2.292 | 56 | 0.026 | 0.007 | 0.083 |
| SP conditional | 3.567 | 56 | 0.001 | 0.031 | 0.105 |
| MCR = 4 | |||||
| IP unconditional | − 0.023 | 23 | 0.982 | − 0.067 | 0.074 |
| IP conditional | 0.034 | 23 | 0.973 | − 0.094 | 0.106 |
| SP unconditional | 0.593 | 23 | 0.559 | − 0.065 | 0.130 |
| SP conditional | 0.363 | 23 | 0.72 | − 0.076 | 0.119 |
| MCR ≥ 5 | |||||
| IP unconditional | 0.103 | 14 | 0.919 | − 0.089 | 0.093 |
| IP conditional | − 0.189 | 14 | 0.853 | − 0.128 | 0.103 |
| SP unconditional | − 3.847 | 14 | 0.002 | − 0.205 | − 0.064 |
| SP conditional | − 2.362 | 14 | 0.033 | − 0.143 | − 0.009 |
One-sample t-tests compared to zero were used to identify when final recall on the various test measures reliably fellow below Baseline (indicating positive suppression-induced forgetting); MCR = Memory Checking Rating (total compliance score across questionnaire items); CI = Confidence Interval; bootstrap results are based on 1000 bootstrap samples.