Table 3.
Experimental condition | Investigated sample | Target Salmonella sp. contamination level in substrate (log CFU/g) |
Total viable count (log CFU/g) |
Salmonella sp. count (log CFU/g) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 0 | Day 2 | Day 6 | Day 0 | Day 2 | Day 6 | ||||
S | Substrate | 0* | 5.2 ± 0.2a | 9.6 ± 0.3b | 10.0 ± 0.2b | <2.0 ± 0.0†a | <2.0 ± 0.0†,a | 4.0 ± 1.3a | |
S + P | Substrate | 4 | 5.0 ± 0.1a | 9.5 ± 0.3b | 10.0 ± 0.1b | 3.6 ± 0.4a | <2.6 ± 0.7ǂ,a | 5.9 ± 0.8a | |
S + P | Substrate | 7 | 7.8 ± 0.2a | 9.5 ± 0.5b | 10.4 ± 0.2c | 7.6 ± 0.1a | 7.5 ± 1.1a | 6.8 ± 1.3a | |
S + L | Substrate | 0* | 5.2 ± 0.2°,a | 10.2 ± 0.0b | 10.9 ± 0.4c | <2.0 ± 0.0°,†,a | <4.5 ± 2.5ǂ,a | 6.2 ± 0.5a | |
S + P + L | Substrate | 4 | 5.0 ± 0.1°,a | 9.9 ± 0.2b | 10.7 ± 0.3c | 3.6 ± 0.4°,a | <4.7 ± 2.3ǂ,a | 6.9 ± 0.7a | |
S + P + L | Substrate | 7 | 7.8 ± 0.2°,a | 10.4 ± 0.1a | 11.7 ± 0.8a | 7.6 ± 0.1°,a | 7.8 ± 0.3a | 7.5 ± 0.3a | |
S + L | Larvae | 0* | 8.2 ± 0.4a | 8.6 ± 0.5a,b | 9.2 ± 0.5b | <2.0 ± 0.0†,a | <4.2 ± 2.5ǂ,a | 5.1 ± 1.6a | |
S + P + L | Larvae | 4 | 8.2 ± 0.4a | 8.8 ± 0.5a,b | 9.1 ± 0.1b | <2.0 ± 0.0†,a | <4.3 ± 2.2ǂ,a | 5.9 ± 0.4a | |
S + P + L | Larvae | 7 | 9.0 ± 0.3a | 9.1 ± 0.3a | 9.6 ± 0.3a | <2.0 ± 0.0†,a | 6.5 ± 0.3a | 5.7 ± 0.1a |
Uninoculated replicates; ° = sample is similar at this timepoint to chicken starter feed without larvae and was not determined a second time;
“<2.0” indicates that Salmonella sp. count was below the detection limit (2 log CFU/g) in every sample;
“<” followed by a value higher than 2.0 log CFU/g indicates that Salmonella sp. count was below the detection limit in at least one, but not all samples; abc Average values for total viable counts and Salmonella sp. counts within each row that share a letter in superscript did not significantly (p ≥ 0.05) increase or decrease between sampling days.