Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 12;193:112984. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112984

Table 1.

Virtual screening and anti-proteolytic evaluation results for the biflavones.

Compound Docking analysis
Anti-proteolytic activity
CDOCKER scorea Binding energyb Hydrogen bondc Interacting residues IC50/μMd Ki/μMe
Biflavones
1 58.1 −129.6 6 Lys157, Leu162, Arg166, Glu167, Asn267, Thr301 13.0 ± 1.2 9.1 ± 0.7
2 50.3 −66.2 4 Lys157, Leu162, Glu167, Thr301 43.2 ± 2.9 36.5 ± 4.2
3 55.6 −117.2 5 Lys157, Leu162, Asp164, Arg166, Gly266 29.8 ± 1.5 17.7 ± 1.1
4 57.6 −123.5 4 Lys157, Leu162, Asp164, Arg166 31.2 ± 3.4 26.5 ± 2.8
5 55.7 −113.4 2 Lys157, Leu162 34.8 ± 3.7 23.6 ± 1.3
6 43.1 −81.6 1 Arg166 36.4 ± 4.8 30.7 ± 2.9
7 50.9 −119.1 5 Lys157, Glu161, Asp164, Arg166, Gly266 9.5 ± 1.2 7.8 ± 0.5
8 47.8 −87.9 3 Lys157, Glu161, Arg166 26.3 ± 3.2 14.3 ± 1.0
9 48.1 −105.2 4 Lys157, Leu162, Arg166, Glu167 22.8 ± 0.9 19.7 ± 1.6
Flavone monomers
Apigenin 29.4 −48.2 2 Ala246, Tyr264 75.7 ± 6.4 n.d.f
Acacetin 28.3 −38.7 1 Tyr264 91.2 ± 11.3 n.d.
Positive control
Psoralidin 38.7 −55.8 1 Tyr264 27.8 ± 2.2 n.d.
a

Indicated as negative value of CDOCKER interaction energy.

b

presented in Kcal/mol.

c

Number of hydrogen bonds formed between inhibitor and PLpro.

d

Concentrations of 50% inhibition of PLpro anti-proteolytic activity, represented as mean ± SD.

e

Inhibition constant, determined by Dixon plots.

f

Not determined.