Table 4.
Outcomes of checklist implementation
| Author/citation | Total number of procedures | Outcome measures | Process measures | Evidence of harm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corso et al27 | 213 | Y - no adverse events related to IR procedures reported during the first year of checklist implementation. | N/S | N/S |
| Dommaraju et al28 | 100 | N/S | Y – safety issues identified in 18% of cases, postponement in 1% of cases, procedural delay greater than 3 min in 3% of cases | N/S |
| Fargen et al22 | 131 | Y - reduced adverse events from 35.2 to 10.0% | Y – quality of communication improved | N/S |
| Koetser et al11 | 195 | N/S | Y – process deviations decreased from 24 to 5%. Postponements and cancellations decreased from 10 to 0%. | N/S |