Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 16;94(1121):20201160. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201160

Table 2.

Comparison of good responders and poor responders, in terms of change in mean PE (E1%), post each cycle of NACT compared with baseline (pre-NACT)

Time point comparison Change in PE (E1%) from pre-NACT to third cycle of NACT Comparison of the two groups in terms of difference of PE (E1%) from pre-NACT to follow-up NACT cycles
Good responder Poor responder
Mean (SD) of absolute change Mean (SD) of % change Mean (SD) of absolute change Mean (SD) of % change p-value of absolute change p-value of % change
Post first cycle - Pre-NACT −0.71 (1.03) −8.0% (19.5) 0.65 (1.07) 18.5% (31.2) <0.001 <0.001
Post second cycle - Pre-NACT −1.52 (1.34) −19.8% (21.7) 1.06 (1.36) 30.1% (38.7) <0.001 <0.001
Post third cycle - Pre-NACT −2.03 (1.24) −28.5% (20.4) 0.98 (1.84) 29.2% (49.1) <0.001 <0.001

NACT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; PE, peak enhancement; SD, standard deviation.