Table 4.
Comparison of good responders and poor responders, in terms of change in mean AUC (E3%s), post each cycle of NACT compared with baseline (pre-NACT)
| Time point comparison | Change in AUC (E3%s) from pre-NACT to third cycle of NACT | Comparison of the two groups in terms of difference of AUC (E3%s) from pre-NACT to follow-up NACT cycles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good responder | Poor responder | |||||
| Mean (SD) of absolute change | Mean (SD) of % change | Mean (SD) of absolute change | Mean (SD) of % change | p-value of absolute change | p-value of % Change | |
| Post first cycle - pre-NACT | −2.15 (3.61) | −1.1% (85.9) | −1.29 (4.87) | 45.0% (130.0) | 0.752 | 0.411 |
| Post second Cycle - pre-NACT | 0.12 (3.99) | 53.3% (114.8) | −0.37 (3.93) | 67.9% (121.7) | 0.916 | 0.689 |
| Post third cycle - pre-NACT | 2.77 (6.35) | 103.4% (139.0) | 1.41 (2.51) | 96.1% (95.4) | 0.784 | 0.817 |
AUC, area under the curve; NACT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; SD, standard deviation.