Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 16;94(1121):20201160. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201160

Table 4.

Comparison of good responders and poor responders, in terms of change in mean AUC (E3%s), post each cycle of NACT compared with baseline (pre-NACT)

Time point comparison Change in AUC (E3%s) from pre-NACT to third cycle of NACT Comparison of the two groups in terms of difference of AUC (E3%s) from pre-NACT to follow-up NACT cycles
Good responder Poor responder
Mean (SD) of absolute change Mean (SD) of % change Mean (SD) of absolute change Mean (SD) of % change p-value of absolute change p-value of % Change
Post first cycle - pre-NACT −2.15 (3.61) −1.1% (85.9) −1.29 (4.87) 45.0% (130.0) 0.752 0.411
Post second Cycle - pre-NACT 0.12 (3.99) 53.3% (114.8) −0.37 (3.93) 67.9% (121.7) 0.916 0.689
Post third cycle - pre-NACT 2.77 (6.35) 103.4% (139.0) 1.41 (2.51) 96.1% (95.4) 0.784 0.817

AUC, area under the curve; NACT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; SD, standard deviation.