Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 16;94(1121):20201160. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201160

Table 7.

NACT cycle-wise diagnostic accuracy of CEUS quantitative parameters in predicting response to NACT

Variable Instance Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Diagnostic Accuracy p-value
 PE (E1%)  Post first cycle 88.2% 38.5% 65.2% 71.4% 66.7% 0.152
 Post second cycle 52.9% 76.9% 75.0% 55.6% 63.3% 0.414
 Post third cycle 47.1% 100.0% 100.0% 59.1% 70.0% 0.106
 TTP (E1s)  Post first cycle 41.2% 76.9% 70.0% 50.0% 56.7% 0.950
 Post second cycle 58.8% 76.9% 76.9% 58.8% 66.7% 0.124
 Post third cycle 84.2% 94.5% 93.7% 81.0% 87.2% 0.003
 AUC (E3%s)  Post first cycle 82.4% 38.5% 63.6% 62.5% 63.3% 0.720
 Post second cycle 82.4% 38.5% 63.6% 62.5% 63.3% 0.933
 Post third cycle 64.7% 69.2% 73.3% 60.0% 66.7% 0.212
 MTT (E1s)  Post first cycle 41.2% 84.6% 77.8% 52.4% 60.0% 0.513
 Post second cycle 70.6% 84.6% 85.7% 68.8% 76.7% 0.004
 Post third cycle 82.4% 92.3% 93.3% 80.0% 86.7% 0.006

AUC, area under the curve; CEUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasound; NACT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NPV, negative predictive value; PE, peak enhancement; PPV, positive predictive value; TTP, time-to-peak.