Table 2.

Detailed overview of the data from lesion conspicuity ratings for both readers. Data from reader one were considered representative for statistical analysis

Nr. of cases per rating category (1, 2 or 3) with a total of 121 lesions	acq2000	syn1000	syn1500	syn2000	syn2500
Lesion Conspicuity worse than acq1000 (1)	Reader 1: 7 Reader 2: 8	Reader 1: 2 Reader 2: 3	Reader 1: 4 Reader 2: 5	Reader 1: 35 Reader 2: 22	Reader 1: 42 Reader 2: 34
Lesion Conspicuity comparable to acq1000 (2)	Reader 1: 60 Reader 2: 59	Reader 1: 70 Reader 2: 49	Reader 1: 55 Reader 2: 47	Reader 1: 56 Reader 2: 61	Reader 1: 63 Reader 2: 62
Lesion Conspicuity better than acq1000 (3)	Reader 1: 54 Reader 2: 54	Reader 1: 49 Reader 2: 69	Reader 1: 62 Reader 2: 69	Reader 1: 30 Reader 2: 38	Reader 1: 16 Reader 2: 25