Table 2.
Variable | E-cigarettes only AOR (95% CI) | Other tobacco only AOR (95% CI) | E-cigarettes and other tobacco AOR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Recall of exposure to The Real Cost campaign (ref: no) | |||
Yes | 0.93 (0.78, 1.10) | 0.60 (0.43, 0.84) | 0.77 (0.63, 0.94) |
Age (ref: 11‒13 years) | |||
14‒15 years | 3.07 (2.37, 3.98) | 2.02 (1.33, 3.08) | 2.57 (1.84, 3.58) |
16‒17 years | 4.65 (3.67, 5.89) | 3.42 (2.28, 5.12) | 3.98 (2.90, 5.46) |
Sex (ref: male) | |||
Female | 1.34 (1.16, 1.56) | 0.85 (0.61, 1.19) | 0.69 (0.56, 0.85) |
Race (ref: non-Hispanic White) | |||
Non-Hispanic Black | 0.42 (0.32, 0.56) | 2.63 (1.68, 4.14) | 0.68 (0.49, 0.94) |
Hispanic | 0.91 (0.75, 1.11) | 1.49 (0.93, 2.38) | 0.74 (0.56, 0.97) |
Other/Multiple races | 0.70 (0.52, 0.94) | 1.32 (0.68, 2.57) | 0.58 (0.42, 0.81) |
Exposure to e-cigarette advertising (ref: low) | |||
Medium | 1.53 (1.28, 1.82) | 1.08 (0.74, 1.58) | 1.14 (0.88, 1.46) |
High | 1.90 (1.57, 2.30) | 1.27 (0.80, 2.03) | 1.69 (1.31, 2.18) |
Exposure to other tobacco advertising (ref: low) | |||
Medium | 0.88 (0.76, 1.03) | 0.67 (0.45, 1.00) | 1.02 (0.80, 1.30) |
High | 0.76 (0.60, 0.97) | 1.12 (0.78, 1.60) | 1.32 (1.01, 1.71) |
Notes: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05).
Survey-weighted multinomial logistic regression was used; the reference group included youth who had not e-cigarettes or other tobacco products in the past 30-days. Estimates were derived from the analytic subpopulation of youth who were: ages 11- to 17-years-old; answered yes or no to the item assessing exposure to The Real Cost campaign; and had complete data for all independent variables, dependent variables, and covariates used in this analysis.