Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;83(2):861–877. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210251

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics and performance on One Card Learning accuracy by biomarker group. All participants are cognitively unimpaired. Statistics reported are of the form mean (standard deviation, SD) unless otherwise specified.

A−T−
(n = 211)
A+T+
(n = 32)
p-value
A−T− vs A+T+
Hedge’s g A+T−
(n = 68)
p-value
A−T− vs A+T−
Hedge’s g
Age, years 62.83 (9.26) 75.26 (7.58) < 0.001 71.60 (10.37) < 0.001
Education, years 15.32 (2.24) 14.47 (2.59) 0.051 15.10 (2.55) 0.507
Male count (%) 118 (56%) 17 (53%) 0.767 36 (53%) 0.667
Follow up duration in years 2.52 (0.21) 2.49 (0.25) 0.434 2.50 (0.27) 0.512
Total CBB administrations 6.08 (1.72) 5.59 (1.46) 0.134 5.49 (1.80) 0.016
OCL accuracy
 sOBJ, z-score 0.348 (0.746) 0.024 (0.884) 0.026 0.42 0.177 (0.985) 0.131 0.21
 ΔOBJ-WSD, z-score 0.504 (0.766) 0.338 (0.914) 0.267 0.21 0.489 (1.025) 0.894 0.02
 ΔOBJ-LR, change per year 0.021 (0.035) 0.012 (0.040) 0.186 0.25 0.022 (0.046) 0.803 −0.03
 ΔOBJ-LME, change per year 0.019 (0.003) 0.017 (0.004) < 0.001 0.72 0.018 (0.004) 0.03 0.30

Note. p-values represent linear model ANOVAs for mean comparisons or Pearson’s Chi-squared test for frequency comparisons. A = amyloid; T = tau; OCL= One Card Learning; sOBJ = subtle objective cognitive impairment (cross-sectional). ΔOBJ = subtle objective cognitive decline (longitudinal); WSD = within subjects standard deviation, positive value indicates higher score across repeated assessments (e.g., benefit from practice); LR = Linear regression model; LME = linear mixed effects model.