Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 15;13(9):10712–10720.

Table 4.

Single-factor analysis of the factors influencing prognosis in patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (x ± sd)

Factors Survival group (n = 22) Death group (n = 22) t/χ2 P
Age (years) 3.300 0.069
    <60 15 (68.18) 9 (40.91)
    ≥60 7 (31.82) 13 (59.09)
Gender 2.277 0.131
    Male 13 (59.09) 14 (63.64)
    Female 9 (40.91) 8 (36.36)
BMI 23.09±5.17 23.41±4.26 0.224 0.824
History of drinking consumption 0.863 0.353
    Yes 15 (68.18) 12 (54.55)
    No 7 (31.82) 10 (45.45)
History of smoking 0.377 0.540
    Yes 10 (45.45) 8 (36.36)
    No 12 (54.55) 14 (63.64)
Education level 0.364 0.547
    High school and below 10 (45.45) 12 (54.55)
    College and university 12 (54.55) 10 (45.45)
Residence 0.834 0.361
    Rural 11 (50) 14 (63.64)
    Urban 11 (50) 8 (36.36)
TNM Staging 5.867 0.015
    I + II 16 (72.73) 8 (36.36)
    III + IV 6 (27.27) 14 (63.64)
Pathological typing 0.226 0.635
    Diffuse 19 (86.36) 20 (90.91)
    Limited 3 (13.64) 2 (9.09)
ECOG score 6.017 0.014
    <3 points 17 (77.27) 9 (40.91)
    ≥3 points 5 (22.73) 13 (59.09)
Peritoneal carcinoma index 3.300 0.069
    <4 15 (68.18) 9 (40.91)
    ≥4 7 (31.82) 13 (59.09)
Treatment method 13.880 <0.001
    CRS + HIPEC 17 (77.27) 6 (27.27)
    CRS + i.p. chemotherapy 5 (22.73) 16 (72.73)