Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 12;2021(10):CD013379. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013379.pub2

Comparison 3. Voice‐enabling communication aid versus usual care with an aid.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
3.1 Ability to phonate 2 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.03 [0.18, 50.08]
3.2 Speech intelligibility 1 20 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
3.3 Quality of life 2 63 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.27 [‐7.21, 11.75]
3.4 Intensive care unit length of stay 3 100 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.20 [‐0.04, 0.44]