Pandian 2020b.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Parallel‐group randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | 50 participants Inclusion criteria: mechanically ventilated adults in ICU who were awake, alert, and attempting to communicate; English‐speaking; and unable to tolerate a 1‐way speaking valve on initial screening. Exclusion criteria: people who were delirious, had a tracheostomy within previous 48 hours, or a laryngectomy. |
|
Interventions |
Intervention BLUSA Talking tracheostomy that has an additional above cuff lumen. Participants received 3 treatment sessions from an SLP focusing on optimising voice – optimal airflow required communicate. Control Assessment by an SLP and provision of communication boards/i‐Pads. |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Implemented a computerised randomisation procedure using Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA) by the primary investigator. Research ID numbers for 50 potential patients were randomly allocated to the control or intervention arm. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Upon obtaining consent, based on the research identification number, the SLP was notified of the allocated arm for each patient by the primary investigator via e‐mail to ensure concealed allocation. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unable to blind due to nature of the intervention. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unable to blind outcome assessors as could visualise the intervention when collecting outcomes. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No evidence of incomplete data. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No evidence of selective reporting bias (trial registration checked). |
Other bias | Low risk | No evidence of other bias. Funding: Smiths Medical Research Grant, Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head‐Neck Nurses Research Grant, and the Johns Hopkins Shirley Sohmer Research Grant (not considered source of bias). Author conflict of interest: none stated. |