Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov;265:112651. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112651

Table B2.

Coefficients from OC2 per-lake tuning.

a0 a1 a2 a3 a4
Victoria 0.61 −1.01 8.54 −50.14 −402.4
Michigan 0.33 −5.95 −6.98 113.3 −191.8
Erie 0.28 −5.5 −14.2 53.4 832.85
Titicaca 0.27 −1.67 −14 27.84 104.51
Turkana 1.59 20.96 227.27 975.89 1299.92
Vattern 0.33 −2.78 −2.63 39.77 56.58
Malaren −0.02 1.08 37.58 187.06 249.08
Kinbasket 0.27 −3.1 −2.52 134.39 271.93
Couture −6.49 194.71 −2045.77 8991.38 −14,236.58
Trout 0.89 0.84 −72.63 −30.02 1811.47
Dorsoidong 0.82 3.69 0.24 −4658.15 30,462.52
Garda 0.28 2.53 −348.46 4776.79 −18,871.85
Dezadeash 12.18 392.7 4647.26 23,992.51 45,903.59
Assean 0.63 27.69 313.32 1258.44 1668.76
Sasyk 0.36 −4.07 −5.77 −314.46 −1031.95
Margaret 0.03 −8.1 14.03 140.64 −284.9
Leven 8.95 207.98 1627.18 5259.3 6052.77
Lumina −0.39 −33.13 −366.8 −1482.77 −1928.09
Isac 0.38 11.18 140.43 605.05 913.14
Pyhajarvi 0.3 2.2 −26.9 −322.12 −642.64