Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 22;18(19):9946. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18199946

Table 1.

Mean difference in trueness and precision between two different strategies of intraoral digital impression and a new scanning tip.

Trueness (µm)
(I) Model (J) Model Mean Difference (I–J) Std. Error p-Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
New tip, suggested strategy Old tip, suggested strategy −11.38 * 2.49 0.000 −17.56 −5.19
Second strategy −24.61 * 2.49 0.000 −30.79 −18.42
Old tip, suggested strategy New tip, suggested strategy 11.38 * 2.49 0.000 5.19 17.56
Second strategy −13.23 * 2.49 0.000 −19.41 −7.04
Second strategy New tip, suggested strategy 24.61 * 2.49 0.000 18.42 30.79
Old tip, suggested strategy 13.23 * 2.49 0.000 7.049 19.41
Precision (µm)
(I) Model (J) Model Mean Difference (I–J) Std. Error p-Value 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
New tip, suggested strategy Old tip, suggested strategy −14.77 * 1.80 0.000 −19.04 −10.50
Second strategy −23.36 * 1.80 0.000 −27.63 −19.09
Old tip, suggested strategy New tip, suggested strategy 14.77 * 1.80 0.000 10.50 19.04
Second strategy −8.59 * 1.80 0.000 −12.86 −4.31
Second strategy New tip, suggested strategy 23.36 * 1.80 0.000 19.09 27.63
Old tip, suggested strategy 8.59 * 1.80 0.000 4.31 12.86

* The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.