Table 8.
Comparisons between current study and other studies of combined joint-preserving surgery in RA cases.
Study | Procedure (Combination) | N | FU (y) | Clinical Score Preop | Clinical Score Final |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Niki et al. [6] | Lapidus + proximal shortening oblique osteotomy | 39 | 3.0 | 52.2 (JSSF RA) | 89.6 (JSSF RA) |
Bhavikatti et al. [11] | Scarf + Weil | 66 | 4.3 | 39.8 (AOFAS) | 88.7 (AOFAS) |
Yano et al. [12] | Modified Mann + shortening oblique osteotomy | 53 | 6.0 | 288.8 (500) (SAFE-Q) | 386.8(500) (SAFE-Q ) |
Current | Modified scarf + shortening offset osteotomy | 53 | 4.6 | 249.4 (500) (SAFE-Q) 41.1 (JSSF hallux) 29.3 (JSSF lesser) |
404 (500) (SAFE-Q) 88.4 (JSSF hallux) 85.2 (JSSF lesser) |
FU, follow-up period; AOFAS, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score.