Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 5;18(19):10473. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910473

Table 8.

Comparisons between current study and other studies of combined joint-preserving surgery in RA cases.

Study Procedure (Combination) N FU (y) Clinical Score Preop Clinical Score Final
Niki et al. [6] Lapidus + proximal shortening oblique osteotomy 39 3.0 52.2 (JSSF RA) 89.6 (JSSF RA)
Bhavikatti et al. [11] Scarf + Weil 66 4.3 39.8 (AOFAS) 88.7 (AOFAS)
Yano et al. [12] Modified Mann + shortening oblique osteotomy 53 6.0 288.8 (500) (SAFE-Q) 386.8(500) (SAFE-Q )
Current Modified scarf + shortening offset osteotomy 53 4.6 249.4 (500) (SAFE-Q)
41.1 (JSSF hallux)
29.3 (JSSF lesser)
404 (500) (SAFE-Q)
88.4 (JSSF hallux)
85.2 (JSSF lesser)

FU, follow-up period; AOFAS, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score.