Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 30;13(19):4938. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194938

Table 2.

Overall performance in both training and validation cohorts of radiomic, clinicoradiological and combined models quantified in terms of area under the ROC curve (AUC), positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), specificity and sensitivity. OR: Odds Ratio, CI: Confidence Interval.

Radomic
Model
Coefficient p-value OR 95%CI Overall Fit Model AUC 95%CI Sensivity Specifity PPP NPP
Surface To Volume Ratio −3.82224 0.0183 0.0219 0.0009
to
0.5237
0.0097 0.0244 0.599 0.733 0.493
to
0.699
0.593
to
0.846
90.9 100.0 23.08 26.2 62.5 24.4 64.3 100.0
Clinico Radiological Model Coefficient p-value OR 95%CI Overall Fit Model AUC 95%CI Sensivity Specifity PPP NPP
Ca19.9 0.001128 0.049 1.0011 1.0000
to
1.0023
0.0018 0.9529 0.72 0.536 0.614
to
0.811
0.392
to
0.675
68.9 20.0 76.27 73.8 58.8 15.4 83.3 79.5
Necrosis 1.10839 0.0633 3.0295 0.9402
to
9.7611
Combined
Model
Coefficient p-value OR 95%CI Overall Fit Model AUC 95%CI Sensivity Specifity PPP NPP
Ca19.9 0.000964 0.0946 1.011 0.9998
to
1.0021
0.0015 0.0178 0.736 0.76 0.648
to
0.838
0.618
to
0.865
58.6 60.0 86.44 78.5 68.0 40.0 81.0 89.2
Necrosis 0.86465 0.1594 2.3742 0.7120
to
7.9167
Surface To Volume Ratio −2.8972 0.1171 0.0552 0.0015
to
2.0684
Training
Validation