Table 3.
Association with smoking cessation | Participants | Number of studies (adjusted) | Risk difference | Odds ratio | Certainty of evidence | Downgrading |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RD (95% CI)* | OR (95% CI) | |||||
Full material | 39147 | 18 (14) | -0.01 (-0.03–0.02) | OR 0.99 (0.78–1.33) AOR 0.95 (0.70–1.28) |
Very low (⊕) | -1 risk of biasa -1 inconsistencyb,c -1 imprecisiond,e |
Short follow-up (≤6 months) | 3474 | 3 (4) | 0.03 (0.00–0.05) | OR 1.49 (1.04–2.13) AOR 0.99 (0.69–1.44) |
Very low (⊕) | -1 risk of biasa -1 inconsistencyb -1 imprecisione |
Long follow-up (>6 months) | 36029 | 16 (12) | -0.01 (-0.03–0.02) | OR 0.96 (0.74–1.24) AOR 0.96 (0.70–1.33) |
Very low (⊕) | -1 risk of biasa -1 inconsistencyb,c -1 imprecisiond,e |
<18 years | 331 | 3 (0) | -0.12 (-0.25–0.01) | OR 0.93 (0.40–2.14) AOR Not available |
Very low (⊕) | -2 risk of biasa,f -1 material with several limitationsb,d,g,h |
≥18 years | 35275 | 14 (12) | -0.01 (-0.03–0.01) | OR 0.96 (0.73–1.25) AOR 0.96 (0.70–1.33) |
Very low (⊕) | -1 risk of biasa -1 inconsistencyb,c -1 imprecisiond,e |
Women | 0 | 0 (1) | Not available | OR Not available AOR 0.94 (0.74–1.19) |
Very low (⊕) |
-1 risk of biasa -1 imprecisione -1 material with several limitationsf,g |
Men | 0 | 0 (1) | Not available | OR Not available AOR 1.00 (0.79–1.27) |
Very low (⊕) |
-1 risk of biasa -1 imprecisione -1 material with several limitationsf,g |
Calculated from unadjusted values. OR: unadjusted odds ratio. AOR: adjusted odds ratio.
Material with several deficits and limitations.
The confidence intervals of individual studies include 1.0, indicating no statistically significant association.
The odds ratios of individual studies show associations in different directions.
The pooled estimate for the unadjusted results includes 1.0, indicating no statistically significant association.
The pooled estimate for the adjusted results includes 1.0, indicating no statistically significant association.
Unadjusted analyses are not available.
The analysis is based on a limited number of studies.
The analysis is based on few participants.