Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 26;18(19):10093. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910093

Table 1.

Advantages and disadvantages of various model systems. This table lists the advantages and disadvantages of using various model systems mentioned in the paper to analyse different evolutionary hypotheses. The different hypotheses are listed in the top row, followed with a short description in the second row.

Patterns of Diversity Diversity Stability
Hypotheses
Niche Space Fluctuating
Environmental Factors
Community Coalescence
Communities can show radiation, be divergent or convergent More diverse communities are more stable Number of niches available gives a maximum for the number of stable members in a community Nutrient-rich and poor periods can make communities more diverse and more flexible Co-evolved communities will maintain their function upon coalescence with a less stable community
Single genotype that radiated into a mixed population All players in the community can be followed exactly Diversity is very low Very limited number of niches is filled in the community Small communities have little potential to respond to fluctuations or might be too instable for fluctuations Origin of remaining players can be easily analysed
Defined mixed population Communities can be analysed, more complex community structures can be followed Due to initial instability of the communities the link with diversity can be challenging Niche space can be constructed in an organised or pre-defined manner Well-constructed communities might have enough potential to show flexibility and increasing diversity Origin of remaining players can be analysed well
Community from fermented food Most players can be analysed, natural behaviour can be followed Natural communities with different diversities and similar function can be used Bacteria are fully adapted to their niche. Bacterial interactions make full community analyses challenging Natural communities contain a lot of microbial potential to see how adaptive they can be towards challenging environments Challenging to see the origin of the final community structure, however, functional groups can be interchanged
Complex natural community Groups of players can be followed over time Most communities found in nature are too diverse and/or too stable to find the relation Bacterial interactions shape niche space and make analyses of all niches challenging Natural communities contain a lot of microbial potential to see how adaptive they can be towards challenging environments Challenging to see the origin of all players to see how the communities behaved after coalescence has taken place