Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 30;22(19):10586. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910586

Table 3.

Summary of clinical studies involving the use of isolated hADSCs on arm disorders for the last 10 years.

Target Disorder No. of Patients Treated
(Age: Mean ± SD)
ADSC Type ADSC
Delivery
Study
Outcome
Year Ref. No.
1 Lateral
epicondylosis
12 (51.85 ± 13.86) Allogeneic Intratendinous injection with fibrin glue Safe and improved elbow pain (VAS 1), performance (MEPI 2), and structural defects 2015 [141]
2 chronic lateral
elbow tendinopathy
18 (46.5 ± NA 3) Autologous, derived from periumbilical zone Percutaneous injection to the affected elbow Significantly improved mean VAS scores for maximum pain score, QuickDASH 4-Compulsory score, QuickDASH-Sport score 2021 [142]
3 Rotator cuff tears 72 (59.05 ± 3.60) Autologous, derived from buttocks ADSC loaded in fibrin glue was injected Although ADSC significantly improved structural outcomes in terms of the retear rate, there were no clinical differences compared to the control group 2017 [143]
4 Rotator cuff tears 11 (64.60 ± 9.60) Autologous, derived from either the periumbilical abdominal area, bilateral flanks, or medial thigh fat Intra-articular injection Significantly higher mean ASES 5 total scores without adverse events 2020 [144]
5 Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction 20 (24.70 ± 4.70) Autologous, derived from abdominal or inner thigh fat Intra-articular injection, applied to BTB 6 autograft Although ADSC significantly improved knee function and healing/maturation of the graft, it was not significantly different compared to the control group 2019 [145]

1 Visual analog scale (VAS); 2 Mayo clinic performance index (MEPI); 3 not available; 4 mean quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand; 5 American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES); 6 bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB).