Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 28;22(19):10499. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910499

Table 1.

Summary of studies reporting data of the diagnostic value of uEV in kidney transplantation.

Authors Year of
Publication
Country of Origin Outcomes and Population Timing of uEV
Measurement
Technique Normalization Marker in uEV Diagnostic Information
Sonoda et al. [16] 2009 Japan Early I/R after transplantation (n = 1) Day 1 before and day 2, 6 after transplantation Immunoblot analysis No AQP1
  • AQP1 was hardly detectable before transplantation and significantly increased on day 2 after transplantation;

  • Decreased AQP1 on day 6 was likely caused by I/R, according to findings in animal I/R models.

Pisitkun et al. [17] 2012 USA Nonspecific findings (n = 2);
TI (n = 7);
TCMR (n = 6);
AMR (n = 3)
Biopsy after transplantation Large-scale liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry No Proteome Compared to all KTR:
  • Cotransporter family showed higher expression in TI;

  • Proteins related to epithelial cell differentiation showed higher expression in TCMR;

  • Proteins related to acute inflammatory response, or antigen processing and presentation showed higher expression in AMR.

Alvarez et al. [18] 2013 Chile Non-DGF (n = 12);
DGF (n = 3)
Day 1, 2, 3 after transplantation Western blotting No NGAL
  • Deceased donors showed higher levels of NGAL than living donors;

  • The DGF group showed higher levels of NGAL than the non-DGF group.

Dimuccio et al. [19] 2014 Italy Early graft function (n = 13);
DGF (n = 12)
Hour 6, day 1, 7, 30 after transplantation Cytofluorimetric analysis & Western blotting Ratio of the expression level in CD133+ uEV and in total uEV CD133
  • The proportion of CD133+ uEVs was much higher in healthy controls than ESRD patients;

  • CD133+ uEVs increased from day 1 to day 30 after transplantation;

  • KTR with DGF showed a lower increase in CD133+ uEV at day 1;

  • The lower level of CD133+ uEV were associated with worse graft vascular lesions.

Esteva-Font et al. [20] 2014 Spain CsA-free (n = 8);
CsA-treated (n = 39)
1 year after transplantation Immunoblotting 24-h urine volume NCC & NKCC2
  • NCC and NKCC2 was more highly expressed in the CsA-treated group, whereas the p-values of all were above 0.05 (NCC: 0.1315, NKCC2 0.0542);

  • NCC and NKCC2 were positively associated with the blood concentration of CsA, with p values of 0.0152 and 0.0497, respectively.

Sigdel et al. [21] 2015 USA No rejection (n = 20);
acute rejection (n = 10)
Biopsy after transplantation Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation & nanoLC-MS/MS No Proteome DEFA5, CD5L, APOM, A2M, APOA2, PROS1, IGHM, FGA, and FGB were significantly increased in the acute rejection group.
Kim et al. [22] 2017 South Korea Normal (n = 15);
BKVN (n = 13);
TCMR (n = 27);
acute AMR (n = 9);
CAMR (n = 16)
Biopsy after transplantation Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction MiR-16 Viral microRNA
  • Increased bkv-miR-B1-5p could diagnose BKVN, with AUC value of 0.989 and cut-off value of 5.9 log10 copies/mL (sensitivity 100%; specificity 98.5%);

  • Increased bkv-miR-B1-5p/miR-16 could diagnose BKVN, with AUC value of 0.985 and cut-off value of 1.2 log10 copies/mL (sensitivity 100%; specificity 98.5%).

Park et al. [23] 2017 USA No rejection (n = 22);
acute rejection (n = 22)
Biopsy after transplantation Integrated kidney exosome analysis No CD3 Increased CD3 could diagnose acute rejection with AUC value of 0.911 and cut-off value of 0.298 μA (sensitivity 92.8%, specificity 87.5%) in discovery set, with AUC value of 0.837. (sensitivity 63.6%, specificity 100%) in validation set.
Tutakhel et al. [24] 2017 Netherlands CNIs-free (n = 13);
CsA-treated (n = 9);
Tacrolimus-treated (n = 23)
At least 6 months after transplantation Immunoblotting Ratio of phosphorylated NCC and total NCC NCC The expression of total NCC or phosphorylated NCC (Thr60) in CNI-treated KTR was significantly higher.
Hinrichs et al. [25] 2018 Denmark No albuminuria (n = 19); albuminuria (n = 18) 1 year after transplantation Western blotting Urinary creatinine γENaC The expression of furin-cleaved γENaC and protease-cleaved γENaC (not full-length γENaC) was significantly increased in KTR with albuminuria.
Lim et al. [26] 2018 South Korea Normal (n = 22);
TCMR (n = 25)
Biopsy after transplantation nanoLC-MS/MS & Western blotting No Proteome
  • APOA1, complement C3, HPX, PIGR, RBP4, etc. were increased in acute TCMR;

  • NEP, PROM1, LRP2, CD9, NAPSA, etc., were decreased in TCMR.

Carreras-Planella et al. [27] 2020 Spain Normal (n = 7);
CNIs nephrotoxicity (n = 5);
IFTA (n = 5)
Biopsy after transplantation Mass spectrometry Ezrin Proteome Compared to IFTA:
  • Uroplakin family (UPK1A, UPK1B, UPK2, UPK3A), RAB1B, etc. were more positive in CNIs nephrotoxity;

  • Complement components (C3, C5, C7) etc. were more negative in CNIs nephrotoxity.

Jung et al. [28] 2020 South Korea Long-term graft survival (n = 57);
CAMR (n = 26)
Biopsy after transplantation Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry No Proteome
  • PODXL, MUC1, etc. were decreased in CAMR;

  • TTR, APOA1, HPX, complement C3, C4a, C4b, etc., were increased in CAMR.

Takada et al. [29] 2020 Japan Normal (n = 20);
IFTA (n = 19);
CNIs nephrotoxicity (n = 17);
CAMR (n = 22)
Biopsy after transplantation Western blotting CD9 SYT17
  • The ratio of SYT17/CD9 could distinguish CAMR from other groups, with AUC value of 0.82 and cut-off value of 0.42 (sensitivity 77%; specificity 87%)

Fekih et al. [8] 2021 USA No rejection (n = 133);
acute AMR (n = 8);
CAMR (n = 16);
TCMR (n = 35);
borderline TCMR (n = 23);
BKVN (n = 5)
Biopsy after transplantation Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction No Messenger RNA
  • 15 mRNA (CXCL11, CD74, IL32, etc.) could discriminate rejection from non-rejection, with the AUC value of 0.93 (sensitivity 84.7%; specificity 94%);

  • 5 mRNA (CD74, complement C3, CXCL11, CD44, and IFNAR2) could distinguish TCMR from ABMR, with AUC value of 0.87 (sensitivity 87.5%; specificity 82.9%).

I/R: ischemia-reperfusion injury; AQP1: aquaporin 1; TCMR: T cell-mediated rejection; AMR: antibody-mediated rejection; TI: tubular injury; KTR: kidney transplant recipients; HLA: human leukocyte antigen; DGF: delayed graft function; NGAL: neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; CsA: cyclosporine A; NCC: sodium-chloride cotransporter; NKCC2: Na-K-Cl cotransporter; nanoLC-MS/MS: nano-scale liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; DEFA5: defensin-alpha 5; CD5L: CD5 molecule-like; APOM: apolipoprotein M; A2M: alpha-2-macroglobulin; APOA2: apolipoprotein A2; PROS1: protein S; IGHM: immunoglobulin heavy constant mu; FGA: fibrinogen alpha chain; FGB: fibrinogen beta chain; BKVN: BK virus associated nephropathy; CAMR: chronic antibody-mediated rejection; AUC: area under the curve; CNIs: calcineurin inhibitors; ENaC: epithelial sodium channel; APOA1: apolipoprotein A1; HPX: hemopexin; PIGR: polymeric immunoglobulin receptor; RBP4: retinol binding protein 4; NEP: neprilysin; PROM1: prominin 1; LRP2: low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 2; NAPSA: napsin A aspartic peptidase; IFTA: interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; SYT17; synaptotagmin 17; PODXL: podocalyxin; MUC1: mucin 1; TTR: transthyretin; RAB1B: Ras-related protein rab-1B; CXCL11: C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 11; IL32: interleukin 32; IFNAR2: interferon alpha and beta receptor subunit 2.