Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 24;10(19):4363. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194363

Table 2.

Direct and indirect effects of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the study population.

FH (n = 260) before Lockdown FH (n = 260) after Lockdown p Value
Indirect Effect
Lipid Profile, n (%) 260 (100.0) 147 (56.5) <0.01
TC, mg/dL * 169.61 ± 18.75 177.83 ± 18.91 0.43
HDL-C, mg/dL * 53.2 ± 10.38 47.78 ± 10.12 <0.05
TG, mg/dL * 90.5 (68.25–114.5) 97.5 (70.5–121.25) 0.11
LDL-C, mg/dL * 103.13 ± 18.02 111.32 ± 18.14 0.25
Non-HDL-C, mg/dL * 117.24 ± 18.83 133.09 ± 19.01 <0.05
LDL-C target, n (%) * 105 (40.4) 81 (31.2) 0.09
Lipidologist consultation, n (%) 260 (100.0) 87 (33.5) <0.001
Cardiologist consultation, n (%) 158 (60.8) 58 (22.3) <0.01
Vascular imaging, n (%) 260 (100.0) 51 (19.6) <0.001
Cause of Indirect Effect
Contagion fear, n (%) - 218 (83.8) -
Long-wait consultation, n (%) - 42 (16.2) -
Direct Effect
SARS-CoV-2 infection, n (%) - 19 (7.3) -
Hospitalization
COVID-19, n (%) - - -
Other causes, n (%) - - -

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, percentages, or median (interquartile range). FH = familial hypercholesterolemia, TC = total cholesterol, HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG = triglycerides, LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LLT = lipid-lowering therapy, SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, COVID = coronavirus disease. * Student’s t-test was performed in subjects for whom the lipid profile was evaluated before and after lockdown.