Stordahl 2009.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | CCT 2‐arm parallel‐group design |
|
Participants | Women at the completion of treatment for breast cancer Type of cancer: breast (n = 20, 100%) Total N randomized: 20 Total N analyzed: 20 N randomized to music group: 10 N randomized to control group: 10 N analyzed in music group: 10 N analyzed in control group: 10 Mean age: 48.35 years Sex: n = 20 (100%) females Ethnicity: n = 9 (45%) Latino, n = 6 (30%) white, n = 5 (25%) African‐American/Caribbean black Setting: outpatient Country: USA |
|
Interventions | 2 treatment conditions:
Music selections provided: contemporary sedative music was paired with standard spoken relaxation directives Number of sessions: 4 Length of sessions: 20‐30 min Categorized as music therapy trial |
|
Outcomes | Depression [Center for Epidimiologic Diseases ‐ Depression Scale (CES‐D)]: post‐test scores Mood (POMS ‐ Short Form): post‐test scores |
|
Notes | — | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Participants and personnel could not be blinded. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Objective outcomes | Low risk | This study did not include objective measures. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Subjective outcomes | High risk | Self‐report measures were used for subjective outcomes. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No indication of selective reporting |
Other bias | Low risk | No indication of conflict of interest |