Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 12;2021(10):CD006911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub4

Stordahl 2009.

Study characteristics
Methods CCT
2‐arm parallel‐group design
Participants Women at the completion of treatment for breast cancer
Type of cancer: breast (n = 20, 100%)
Total N randomized: 20
Total N analyzed: 20
N randomized to music group: 10
N randomized to control group: 10
N analyzed in music group: 10
N analyzed in control group: 10
Mean age: 48.35 years
Sex: n = 20 (100%) females
Ethnicity: n = 9 (45%) Latino, n = 6 (30%) white, n = 5 (25%) African‐American/Caribbean black
Setting: outpatient
Country: USA
Interventions 2 treatment conditions:
  1. Music therapy condition: music‐assisted relaxation

  2. Relaxation condition: relaxation directive


Music selections provided: contemporary sedative music was paired with standard spoken relaxation directives
Number of sessions: 4
Length of sessions: 20‐30 min
Categorized as music therapy trial
Outcomes Depression [Center for Epidimiologic Diseases ‐ Depression Scale (CES‐D)]: post‐test scores
Mood (POMS ‐ Short Form): post‐test scores
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Participants and personnel could not be blinded.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Objective outcomes Low risk This study did not include objective measures.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Subjective outcomes High risk Self‐report measures were used for subjective outcomes.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No indication of selective reporting
Other bias Low risk No indication of conflict of interest