Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 25;26(6):1515–1524. doi: 10.1007/s10741-020-09960-w

Table 1.

Influence of: sex, strain, and confirmation of the TAC on the level of heterogeneity in EDD and ESD

EDD ESD
# MD (mm) [95%CI] # MD (mm) [95%CI]
Sex p = 0.41, adj. R2 = − 0.44% p = 0.85 adj. R2 = − 3.38%
  Female 13 0.26 − 0.02, 0.55 8 0.58 0.13, 1.04
  Male 217 0.38 0.31, 0.45 179 0.53 0.43, 0.62
  Mixed 36 0.35 0.18, 0.53 24 0.48 0.24, 0.73
  Not reported 75 0.27 0.15, 0.39 59 0.45 0.29, 0.61
Mouse strain p = 0.04, adj. R2 = 2.84% p = 0.11 adj. R2 = 5.51%
  129 15 0.14 − 0.12, 0.39 14 0.45 0.29, 0.61
  Balb/c 2 − 0.23 − 1.05, 0.60 3 0.53 0.43, 0.62
  C57BL/6 250 0.40 0.34, 0.47 194 0.53 0.43, 0.62
  FVB 22 0.11 − 0.11, 0.32 15 0.58 0.13, 1.04
  Mixed 7 0.10 − 0.33, 0.52 6 0.53 0.43, 0.62
  Other 12 0.21 − 0.08, 0.50 12 0.53 0.43, 0.62
  Swiss 3 − 0.03 − 0.61, 0.55 3 0.45 0.29, 0.61
  Not reported 30 0.21 0.20, 0.58 23 0.45 0.29, 0.61
TAC confirmed p = 0.63, adj. R2 = − 0.36% p = 0.66 adj. R2 = − 1.52%
  Echo/doppler 85 0.34 0.22, 0.45 63 0.51 0.35, 0.68
  Invasive pressure 33 0.27 0.10, 0.45 29 0.40 0.17, 0.64
  Not reported 223 0.37 0.30, 0.43 178 0.52 0.42, 0.62