Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 17;38(5):483–494. doi: 10.1007/s10585-021-10119-6

Table 4.

Performance of models using features other than only lesion features

Metric NLP NLP + Lesion Ring Clinical Clinical + Lesion
AUC 0.65 [0.51, 0.78] 0.63 [0.52, 0.75] 0.67 [0.56, 0.78] 0.56 [0.43, 0.70] 0.65 [0.53, 0.77]
Accuracy 0.59 [0.49, 0.70] 0.60 [0.50, 0.71] 0.63 [0.54, 0.73] 0.53 [0.41, 0.64] 0.62 [0.51, 0.72]
Sensitivity 0.52 [0.33, 0.70] 0.60 [0.43, 0.76] 0.67 [0.51, 0.83] 0.56 [0.37, 0.75] 0.62 [0.45, 0.79]
Specificity 0.67 [0.50, 0.85] 0.61 [0.46, 0.75] 0.59 [0.45, 0.74] 0.49 [0.31, 0.67] 0.61 [0.45, 0.77]

These features were extracted from a segmentation of the normal liver parenchyma (NLP); the NLP and the lesion (NLP + Lesion); a ring at the border of the segmentation (Ring); using the clinical characteristics (Clinical); and the clinical characteristics combined with lesion features (Clinical + Lesion)

*Abbreviations: AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; NLP normal liver parenchyma; CNN convolutional neural network