Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 12;11:20222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97617-5

Table 2.

Relative effects of the Public treatment on prevention intentions in Studies 1 and 2. We compare the Public treatment to each of our other treatments, across the treatment conditions of Studies 1 and 2 combined. For each comparison, we report mean prevention intentions (with 95% CIs) by condition and the relative effect of the Public treatment (both among all subjects, and subjects for whom we measured our dependent variables first).

All subjects (n = 1930) Dependent variables first (n = 981)
Public vs. Personal

Public = 82.48 [81.34, 83.61],

Personal = 79.93 [78.66, 81.19],

b = 2.55, t = 2.90, d = 0.16,

p = 0.004, qc = 0.022, qs = 0.019

Public = 83.22 [81.69, 84.75],

Personal = 79.42 [77.65, 81.19],

b = 3.80, t = 3.25, d = 0.25,

p = 0.001, qc = 0.007, qs = 0.006

Public vs. Personal + Public

Public = 82.48 [81.34, 83.61],

Personal + Public = 81.07 [79.81, 82.32],

b = 1.41, t = 1.60, d = 0.09,

p = 0.109, qc = 0.501, qs = 0.408

Public = 83.22 [81.69, 84.75],

Personal + Public = 83.14 [81.60, 84.67],

b = 0.13, t = 0.11, d = 0.01,

p = 0.913, qc = 1.000, qs = 1.000