Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 25;53(3):436–448. doi: 10.3947/ic.2020.0126

Table 1. Characteristics of studies included.

Author, Year [Reference No.] Groups, N Age Male, n (%) NEWS2 score D1 Hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen D1, n (%) Hospitalization, requiring HFNC or non-invasive mechanical ventilation D1, n (%) Time to clinical improvement (d) Clinical improvement by D28, n (%) Mortality, n (%) Serious adverse events, n (%)
1 Cao, 2020 [17] 20 Ruxolitinib group 63 (51 - 65) 12 (60.0%) 5 (4 - 7) 18 (90.0%) 2 (10.0%) 12 (10 - 19) 18 (90.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0
21 SOC group 64 (59 - 71) 12 (57.1%) 4 (4 - 5) 18 (85.7%) 3 (14.3%) 15 (10 - 18) 18 (85.7%) 3 (14.3%) 4
2 Giudice, 2020 [16] 7 Ruxolitinib group 61 (53 - 70) 6 (86%) - 5 (71.4%) 1 (14.3%) 24 (16 - 44) 3 (42.9%) 1 (14.3%) 1
10 SOC group 63.5 (31 - 85) 7 (70.0%) - 3 (30.0%) 1 (10.0%) 34 (9 - 60) NA 1 (10.0%) 4
3 Rosée, 2020 [5] 14 Ruxolitinib sub-group 66 (55 - 81) 11 (79.0%) 8.5 (4 - 16) 2 (14.0%) 11 (79.0%) 18 (9 - 36) 10 (71.4%) 1 (7.1%) -
105 SOC group - 47 (44.8%) - - - - 66 (63.0%) 12 (11%) -
4 Koschmieder, 2020 [19] 1 Ruxolitinib group 55 1 (100.0%) - 1 (100.0%) - 15 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) -
5 Saraceni, 2020 [18] 1 Ruxolitinib group 59 1 (100.0%) - - 1 (100.0%) 45 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) -
6 Portsmore, 2020 [20] 1 Ruxolitinib group 74 0 - - 1 (100.0%) 28 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) -
1 Ruxolitinib group 54 1 (100.0%) - - 1 (100.0%) 64 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) -
7 Innes, 2020 [21] 1 Ruxolinitib group 53 1 (100.0%) - - 1 (100.0%) 28 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) -

Values are presented as median interquartile range-unless otherwise specified.

Days of hospitalization, median interquartile range 18.

NEWS2, The National Early Warning Score 2; D1, day 1; SOC, standard of care; HFNC, high-flow nasal cannula; D1, day 1; D28, day 28; NA, non-applicable.