Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 29;15:736786. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.736786

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Effects of the CEF and Aβ25–35 administration (AD model) on spatial memory and learning in mice in the Barnes test. (A) Episodic memory and learning were evaluated by the latency (s) to find an escape box during the first day of training. (B) General exploratory activity was estimated by the total number of nosepokes on the test day. (C) Long-term spatial memory was evaluated by the percentage of nosepokes to the target hole on the test day. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM of the values obtained in an independent group of animals (n = 7–15 per group). Statistically significant differences: &p < 0.05, &&p < 0.01, &&&p < 0.001 compared with values of the same group on the first training session; #p < 0.05 compared with respective values of the “Aβ + saline” group.