Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 29;11:752545. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.752545

Table 1.

Baseline patient characteristics.

Pembrolizumab group (n = 49) Bevacizumab group (n = 53) P-value
Age, years, median (IQR) 64 (59-67) 60 (50-65) 0.005
 <65 27 (55.1%) 39 (73.6%)
 ≥65 22 (44.9%) 14 (26.4%)
Sex 0.475
 male 39 (79.6%) 39 (73.6%)
 female 10 (20.4%) 14 (26.4%)
Smoking history 0.002
 Never 12 (24.5%) 29 (54.7%)
 Previous or current 37 (75.5%) 24 (45.3%)
ECOG PS 0.669
 0 3 (6.1%) 2 (3.8%)
 1 46 (93.9%) 51 (96.2%)
Tumor histology 0.607
 Adenocarcinoma 47 (95.9%) 52 (98.1%)
 Others 2 (4.1%) 1 (1.9%)
Stage 0.182
 IIIB~IIIC 4 (8.2%) 9 (17.0%)
 IV 45 (91.8%) 44 (83.0%)
Number of metastatic sites 0.001
 0 4 (8.2%) 9 (17.0%)
 1-2 24 (49.0%) 38 (71.7%)
 ≥3 21 (42.9%) 6 (11.3%)
Metastatic site
 Bone 25 (51.0%) 16 (30.2%) 0.032
 Brain 10 (20.4%) 7 (13.2%) 0.330
 Liver 5 (10.2%) 2 (3.8%) 0.256
 Chest 40 (81.6%) 38 (71.7%) 0.237
 Adrenal gland 13 (26.5%) 7 (13.2%) 0.090
Hematologic parameters, median (IQR)
 LDH, U/L 193 (144.50-260.00) 198 (170-229) 0.492
 NLR 3.20 (2.35-5.77) 2.49 (1.99-4.21) 0.107
 dNLR 2.19 (1.73-3.13) 1.92 (1.49-2.55) 0.098
 PLR 149.26 (121.62-196.62) 138.08 (97.13-214.66) 0.177
 LMR 2.96 (2.17-3.78) 3.50 (2.30-4.73) 0.252
 AEC, ×109/L 0.11 (0.05-0.23) 0.16 (0.09-0.26) 0.181
PD-L1 TPS <0.001
 <1% 9 (18.4%) 8 (15.1%)
 1%-49% 9 (18.4%) 1 (1.9%)
 >50% 13 (26.5%) 3 (5.7%)
 unknown 18 (36.7%) 41 (77.4%)
Pembrolizumab/Bevacizumab exposure, doses 0.636
 0 to ≤6 21 (42.9%) 21 (39.6%)
 >6 to ≤12 17 (34.7%) 22 (41.5%)
 >12 to ≤18 7 (14.3%) 4 (7.5%)
 >18 4 (8.2%) 6 (11.3%)
Radiotherapy combination 0.118
 Yes 10 (20.4%) 5 (9.4%)
 No 39 (79.6%) 48 (90.6%)

IQR, interquartile range; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; dNLR, derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; LMR, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; AEC, absolute eosinophil count; PD-L1 TPS, programmed death-1 tumor proportion score.

Some percentages may not sum to 100% because of rounding.