Table 3.
First author | Year published | Retired vs. current athletes | Quality in prognosis studies-6 bias domains | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participation | Attrition | Prognostic factor measurement | Outcome measurement | Confounding | Statistical analysis/reporting | Overall | |||
Stamm (80) | 2015 | Retired | High | N/A | High | High | High | Low | High |
Stamm (81) | 2015 | Retired | High | N/A | High | High | High | Low | High |
Schultz (82) | 2018 | Retired | High | N/A | High | High | High | Moderate | High |
Kaufmann (83) | 2021 | Retired | High | N/A | High | High | High | Low | High |
Alosco (92) | 2017 | Retired | High | N/A | Moderate | Low | High | Low | High |
Montenigro (93) | 2017 | Retired | High | N/A | High | Low | High | Low | High |
Alosco (94) | 2018 | Retired | High | N/A | High | Moderate | High | Moderate | High |
Solomon (91) | 2016 | Retired | High | N/A | High | Low | High | Low | High |
Roberts (71) | 2019 | Retired | High | N/A | Moderate | Low | High | Moderate | High |
Iverson (86) | 2020 | Retired | High | N/A | Moderate | Low | High | Moderate | High |
Iverson (85) | 2021 | Retired | High | N/A | Moderate | Low | High | Moderate | High |
Bryant (122) | 2020 | Current & Retired | High | N/A | Moderate | Low | High | High | High |
Hunzinger (121) | 2021 | Current & Retired | High | N/A | Moderate | Low | High | Moderate | High |
Houck (90) | 2020 | Current | Moderate | N/A | High | Low | High | Low | High |
Brett (84) | 2019 | Current | Low | N/A | High | Low | High | Moderate | High |
Caccese (87) | 2019 | Current | Low | N/A | High | Low | High | Moderate | High |
Caccese (123) | 2020 | Current | Moderate | N/A | High | Low | High | Moderate | High |
Caccese (88) | 2020 | Current | Low | N/A | High | Low | High | Moderate | High |
Caccese (89) | 2020 | Current | High | N/A | High | Low | High | High | High |
Caccese (124) | 2020 | Current | High | N/A | High | High | High | Moderate | High |
Asken (111) | 2020 | Current | Low | N/A | High | Low | High | Low | High |
A customized guide for rating these articles is provided in the online supplement. All studies were rated as having an overall high risk for bias.