Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov;11(11):4543–4555. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-1324

Table 2. Diagnostic performance of AccuFFRivus, %DS, and MLA (Per-vessel) (n=32).

AccuFFRivus ≤0.80 (95% CI) DS% ≥50% (95% CI) MLA <4 mm2 (95% CI)
Accuracy 93.75 (79.19–99.23) 65.62 (46.81–81.43) 53.12 (34.74–70.91)
Sensitivity 92.86 (66.13–99.82) 28.57 (8.39–58.10) 57.14 (28.86–82.34)
Specificity 94.44 (72.71–99.86) 94.44 (72.71–99.86) 50.00 (26.02–73.98)
Positive likelihood ratio 16.71 (2.47–112.91) 5.14 (0.64–41.04) 1.14 (0.60–2.18)
Negative likelihood ratio 0.08 (0.01–0.50) 0.76 (0.53–1.07) 0.86 (0.40–1.83)
Positive predictive value 92.86 (65.81–98.87) 80.00 (33.39–96.96) 47.06 (31.75–62.94)
Negative predictive value 94.44 (71.93–99.12) 62.96 (54.51–70.69) 60.00 (41.20–76.25)