Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 23;49(6):589–597. doi: 10.1177/1403494819875337

Table I.

Group comparisons, follow-up periods and clinical end points for which rate ratios were to be estimated according to the study protocol.

Comparison Follow-up period Clinical end point
People exposed to long-term sickness absence (LTSA) due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) vs. people in the standard population 1 February 2010–31 December 2015 Redeemed prescription for antidepressant drugs (ATC-code N06A) or psychiatric hospital treatment with a depressive mood disorder (ICD-10: F32–F33) as principal diagnosis
Same as above Same as above Redeemed prescription for antidepressant drugs (ATC-code N06A)
Same as above Same as above Psychiatric hospital treatment with a depressive mood disorder (ICD-10: F32–F33) as principal diagnosis
LTSA due to MSD in severity category 1 a vs. the standard population 26 April 2010–31 December 2015 Redeemed prescription for antidepressant drugs (ATC-code N06A) or psychiatric hospital treatment with a depressive mood disorder (ICD-10: F32–F33) as principal diagnosis
LTSA due to MSD in severity category 2–3 vs. LTSA due to MSD in severity category 1 Same as above Same as above
Exposed vs. not exposed to self-rated musculoskeletal pain in the neck, shoulders, elbow, forearm, hand or lower back 1 January 2011–31 December 2015 Same as above
a

At the first consultation with the sickness benefit office, the sick-listed person is classified into one of the following severity categories: (a) likely to return to the labour force within three months, (b) unlikely to return to the labour force within three months but able to participate in activities aimed at facilitating a return or (c) unlikely to return to the labour force within three months and unable to participate in activities.