Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 29;26(19):5905. doi: 10.3390/molecules26195905

Table 10.

Advantages and disadvantages of various nanocarriers in drug delivery.

Nanocarrier Advantages Disadvantages Refs.
Liposomes Less cytotoxic
Amphiphilic and Self-assembly capability
Can load both hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs
High payload
Longer duration of action
Could crystallize during long term storage
Poor control over the drug release rate
Lack of means to prevail biological barriers
Sufficient loading of drugs for which pH and ion gradients do not apply
Leakage and fusion of loaded drug Phospholipids may undergo oxidation and hydrolysis
[117,118]
Dendrimers Uniformity in molecular weight, size, shape and branch length
A high degree of branching results in a high surface area
Availability of internal cavities with Polyvalency offer high loading and targetting
High water solubility
Biocompatibility and absence of immunogenicity
Complex synthesis process
Possibility of incomplete reactions with terminal groups
Steric hindrance to the core molecule and dendrons obstructs the formation of high generation dendrimer
[119,120]
Exosomes Cell targetting anad gene delivery
Ability to loading both hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs
Exosomes membranes possess many proteins thus show very high organotropism
Immunocompatible if derived autologous
Rapid clearance from the blood
Current methods available suffer low drug loading and retention
Purification and large scale extraction is a hassle
[121,122]
Metal Nanoparticles Tunable sizes and shapes (spherical, triangular, cubic, rods, starts, etc.)
Possibilities of easy functionalization
Size-dependent activity
RES uptake might result in low biocompatibility and cytotoxicity
Instability of nanoparticles
[88,123]
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles Ordered porous structure
High surface area
Tunable pore size and functionalization
Poorly water-soluble drugs and gene delivery
More studies are needed on cytotoxicity
The presence of high surface silanol groups interacts with the phospholipids of the red blood cell membranes leads to hemolysis
[124,125]
Carbon nanotubes High surface area, enhanced conductivity and strength
Vast functionalization sites
Optical properties
For targeted delivery
High immunogenicity, carcinogenicity and cytotoxicity
Non-biodegradable
Poor aqueous solubility and poor absorption
[103,126]
Nanocapsules/nanospheres Efficient drug accumulation at the target site
Controlled release of drug over weeks
Non-degradable polymers accumulate in tissues
In vivo metabolism and elimination, routes are not elucidated
[127,128]
Quantum dots Semiconductor nanocrystals with broad excitation spectra, narrow emission spectra, tunable emission peaks
Possess long fluorescence lifetimes and negligible photobleaching
Ability to conjugate with proteins and multiple molecular targets simultaneously
Quantum dot degradation result in the leaching of heavy metals such as Cadmium which generates reactive oxygen species (ROS)
High cytotoxicity
[129,130,131]
Nanofibers High specific surface area
Multiple drugs with high loading capacity
Tunable physicochemical properties
Good Spatio-temporal distribution of drugs
Great choice of polymers that are biodegradable and biocompatible
Designed for various routes of administration for both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs
Scalability is an issue
Poor control over nanofiber dimensions
Need to optimize the solvent system for each polymer in the electrospinning process
[96,132,133,134]