Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 4;26(19):6024. doi: 10.3390/molecules26196024

Table 1.

Comparison of the mineral content results obtained using different analytical methods (ED-XRF qualitative–quantitative, ED-XRF with standard sample, and ICP-MS/ICP-OES) for bee pollen samples collected on 2 June 2019 (P2) and 20 July 2019 (P5).

Mineral Method Sample (Date) Mean + SD [mg/kg] Method Mean + SD [mg/kg] Method Mean [mg/kg]
Manganese ED-XRF Qual-Quantitative analysis without standard sample P2 (2 June 2019) 37.0 ± 7.1 ED-XRF Fundamental Parameter method with standard sample 53.3 ± 11.8 ICP-MS 62.0
Copper 8.1 ± 0.2 4.6 ± 0.2 5.7
Zinc 26.8 ± 4.9 26.6 ± 0.2 31.0
Potassium 4115.1 ± 263.9 4611.6 ± 379.6 ICP-OES 4600.0
Calcium 1131.4 ± 133.3 1376.5 ± 143.8 1500.0
Iron 48.0 ± 5.4 63.9 ± 2.2 49.0
Phosphorus 3085.9 ± 69.7 4482.5 ± 490.5 4600.0
Sulfur 2397.8 ± 224.4 2547.7 ± 385.7 2700.0
Chlorine 375.1 ± 72.7 - -
Manganese ED-XRF Qual-Quantitative analysis without standard sample P5 (20 July 2019) 15.7 ± 2.1 ED-XRF Fundamental Parameter method with standard sample 17.0 ± 0.7 ICP-MS 16.0
Copper 8.6 ± 0.6 4.23 ± 0.4 4.4
Zinc 48.5 ± 0.4 39.0 ± 1.9 41.0
Potassium 4146.3 ± 27.3 4600.7 ± 71.6 ICP-OES 4400.0
Calcium 608.3 ± 14.1 697.9 ± 24.1 680.0
Iron 63.2 ± 4.8 67.2 ± 8.2 68.0
Phosphorus 2551.1 ± 80.1 3475.5 ± 124.4 3500.0
Sulfur 1915.2 ± 16.6 1907.5 ± 44.3 1900.0
Bromine 19.1 ± 2.7 - -
Chlorine 615.1 ± 19.4 - -