Table 1.
No. | Resin | Hybrid | Fabrication Method | Tensile Strength (MPa) |
Flexural Strength (MPa) | Impact Strength (kJ/m2) |
Remark | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PP | Filler | Extrusion | 31 | - | - | Increasing basalt content led to a decrease in tensile strength. | [20] |
2 | Epoxy | Filler | Hand layup | 273 | 497 | 426 | The addition of a large amount of basalt reduced the impact strength. | [21] |
3 | Polyester | Laminate | Hand layup | 78 | 175 | - | Mechanical properties of BGRP composite are lower than BCRP laminates. | [22] |
4 | Epoxy | Laminate | Vacuum begging | 448 | - | - | The tensile strength of BGRP composite was lower than GFRP laminates. | [24] |
5 | Polyester | Laminate | Hand layup | 293 | 302 | 192 | The stacking sequence of BGRP improved mechanical properties. | [23] |
6 | Epoxy | Laminate | Vacuum begging | 225 | 195 | 212 | Increased glass fiber increased the tensile strength (BGRP < GFRP composite). | [25] |
7 | Epoxy | Laminate | Vacuum begging | - | - | 4 | Hybrid BGRP had a lower impact strength than the BFRP composite. | [26] |
8 | Polyester | Laminate | Hand layup | 270 | - | 946 | Hybrid BGRP offered the highest value of mechanical properties compared to GFRP and BFRP laminates. | [28] |
9 | Polyester | Laminate | Hand layup | 246 | - | 204 | Hybrid BGRP laminate had the highest tensile strength. | [29] |