Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Health Care. 2018 Aug 2;23(2):286–310. doi: 10.1177/1367493518788466

Table 5.

Breastfeeding self-efficacy intervention studies.

First author (year) Study design and location Variables (tools) Sample size and participants Findings Level of evidence Grade
Abbass-Dick et al. (2017) Pre/post test experimental study (phase 2 of the study)
Ontario, Canada
IV: Intervention—An eHealth breastfeeding and co-parenting resource, interactive with multimodal delivery of information (developed based on feedback from Phase I)
DV: BF Self-efficacy (BFSE Short Form)
N = 31 mothers and N = 35 fathers (primiparous)
Race/ethnicity not provided
Maternal and paternal BF self-efficacy scores rose posttest 2.d A
Chan (2016) Experimental design with random assignment
Hong Kong
IV: Intervention—2 hour BF workshop prenatally and 30–60 minute telephone session at 2 weeks PP. Control—standard care
DV: BF exclusivity, BF Self-efficacy (BFSE Short Form)
N = 71 primiparous mothers (35 intervention, 36 control)
95% Chinese
BFSE scores significantly higher in intervention group from prenatal to 2 weeks PP (p < .01) and higher than control group at 2 weeks PP (p < .01)
Exclusive BF in intervention group higher at each time point to 6 months, on significant at 8 weeks PP (p = .02)
1.d A
Dodt et al. (2015) Experimental, pre/post-test design, interventional and control groups
Brazil
IV: Intervention—flip chart containing education on BFSE during PP period in hospital (between 6 hours PP and hospital discharge). Control—no flip chart
DV: BF Self-efficacy (BFSE Short Form), BF rates
N = 201 mothers (100 intervention, 101 control) (any parity)
Primarily Brazilian
Intervention group had higher change in BFSE scores from immediate PP period to 2 months PP (p = .032).
Exclusive BF at 2 months PP: intervention group, 100%, control group 41%
2.d A
Hauck et al. (2007) Experimental study Australia IV: Intervention—Breastfeeding journal with education material provided at approximately 36-week gestation. Control—No journal provided
DV: BF Self-efficacy (BFSE Scale)
N = 276 primiparous mothers (136 intervention, 140 control)
Primarily Australian
*Both groups attended a prenatal BF workshop
No statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups in BFSE during the immediate PP period (p = .23) or the 12 weeks PP period (p = .75) 2.c B
Joshi et al. (2016) Two-group, repeated measures quasi-experimental study
Nebraska
IV: Intervention—Computer based BF educational support program administered last 6 weeks of pregnancy. Control—printed educational material on BF.
DV: BF exclusivity, BF Self-efficacy (BFSE Short Form)
N = 46 mothers (any parity)
Rural, Hispanic
Intervention group at higher intent to BF 1 week PP
Not significant but BFSE scores decreased from 6 weeks to 6 months in the control group, and increased in the intervention group
2.c A
Liu et al. (2017) Comparative, quasi-experimental study
China
IV: Intervention—1 hour prenatal BF workshop and 1-hour BF counseling session within 24 hours of birth. Control—standard care.
DV: BF exclusivity at 8 weeks PP, BF Self-efficacy (BFSE Short Form)
N = 130 (65 each group) primiparous mothers
Primarily Chinese
Intervention group had significantly higher BFSE scores at 4 weeks PP (p < .0001) & 8 weeks PP (p < .0001) than the control group
At 8 weeks PP 24.6% of intervention infants were exclusively BF, compared to 1.5% of control group infants (p < .0001)
2.c A
McQueen et al. (2011) RCT (pilot study)
Ontario, Canada
IV: Intervention—Individual BFSE enhancing sessions, 2 PP in hospital and 1 a week after birth. Control—standard care. Provided third trimester.
DV: BF Self-efficacy (BFSE Short Form), BF duration and exclusivity. 4 weeks PP
N = 150 (69 intervention, 81 control) primiparous mothers
81% Caucasian, 14% Aboriginals of North America
Mothers in the intervention group had higher rates of BF self-efficacy, duration, and exclusivity at 4 and 8 weeks PP, but not significant
Intervention was feasible
1.c A
Nichols (2009) Experimental study
Queensland, Australia
IV: Intervention—BFSE interactive workbook. Control—Workbook on parenting, no mention of BF.
DV: BF duration and exclusivity, BF self-efficacy (BFSE Scale)
N = 90 (number in each group not provided) mothers (any parity)
Primarily Australian
Mothers in the intervention group at higher BFSE (p = .03) 2.c A
Noel-Weiss (2006) RCT Canada IV: Intervention—delivered prenatally, after 34 weeks gestation, a 2.5 hour BF workshop based on Bandura’s self-efficacy theory and adult learning. Control—standard care
DV: BF Self-efficacy (BFSE Short Form), duration of BF
N = 110 primiparous mothers
Race/ethnicity not provided
BFSE higher in intervention group
Exclusive BF higher in intervention group at 4 and 8 weeks PP
1.c A
Wu (2014) Experimental, pre/post test, 2 group design
Wuhan, China
IV: Intervention—3 phase (2 face-to-face in the immediate PP period, 1 via telephone 1-week after hospital discharge) individual sessions focused on self-efficacy and BF. Control—Standard care.
DV: BF self-efficacy (BFSE Short Form),
N = 74 primiparous mothers (37 each group)
Primarily Chinese
Intervention group had significantly higher BFSE at 4 weeks (R2 = .74, p < .001) and 8 weeks PP (R2 = .74, p < .001) 2.d A