Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 12;22:869. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04759-8

Table 4.

AUC values for the accuracy of IOLV evaluation for each reader and method in different sessions

AUC SE 95% CI P value
1st session
 Reader 1
  Method 1 0.568 0.075 0.423–0.705
  Method 2 0.679 0.067 0.535–0.802
  Difference 0.111 0.076 −0.038-0.261 0.145
 Reader 2
  Method 1 0.636 0.071 0.491–0.765
  Method 2 0.816 0.054 0.684–0.909
  Difference 0.180 0.075 0.033–0.327 0.016
2nd session
 Reader 1
  Method 1 0.633 0.072 0.488–0.763
  Method 2 0.700 0.068 0.557–0.819
  Difference 0.067 0.064 −0.059-0.193 0.299
 Reader 2
  Method 1 0.647 0.07 0.503–0.779
  Method 2 0.753 0.063 0.614–0.862
  Difference 0.106 0.064 −0.020-0.232 0.099

Note. Data represent AUC values, standard errors, 95% confidence intervals for the diagnostic performance of each method, classified as intact or tear based on MRI grade using ROC curves. P-value represents the statistical significance of the differences between the two AUCs using methods 1 and 2, calculated using the DeLong test