TABLE 3.
Test | Metrics | Descriptive statistics | ANOVA | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | ||||||||||||
N | Mean | SD | Age group | Gender | Age group | Gender | Age × gender | |||||||
F | P‐value | F | P‐value | F | P‐value | F | P‐value | F | P‐value | |||||
OKN 20 deg/s | Average eye velocity CCW (deg/s) | 286 | −16.88 | 1.91 | 2.776 | 0.097 | 0.395 | 0.530 | 4.091 | 0.044 | 0.059 | 0.808 | 1.744 | 0.188 |
Average eye velocity CW (deg/s) | 286 | 17.66 | 1.34 | 1.077 | 0.300 | 0.774 | 0.380 | 0.908 | 0.341 | 0.065 | 0.799 | 0.340 | 0.560 | |
Gain | 286 | 0.86 | 0.08 | 2.440 | 0.119 | 0.346 | 0.557 | 2.168 | 0.142 | 0.832 | 0.362 | 0.162 | 0.687 | |
Gain asymmetry (%) | 286 | 2.27 | 4.60 | 0.114 | 0.735 | 0.941 | 0.333 | 0.127 | 0.721 | 0.337 | 0.562 | 3.227 | 0.074 | |
Area under velocity fit +(30 deg) | 286 | 8172 | 1452 | 0.035 | 0.853 | 0.164 | 0.685 | 0.017 | 0.896 | 0.058 | 0.810 | 0.012 | 0.915 | |
Area under velocity fit ‐(30 deg) | 286 | −8525 | 1378 | 0.423 | 0.516 | 0.707 | 0.401 | 0.346 | 0.557 | 0.611 | 0.435 | 0.028 | 0.868 | |
OKN 60 deg/s | Average eye velocity CCW (deg/s) | 447 | −38.27 | 8.71 | 14.709 | 0.000 | 0.118 | 0.731 | 11.961 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.949 | 0.382 | 0.537 |
Average eye velocity CW (deg/s) | 447 | 41.65 | 8.85 | 0.118 | 0.731 | 0.247 | 0.620 | 18.978 | 0.000 | 0.077 | 0.782 | 0.180 | 0.672 | |
Gain | 447 | 0.68 | 0.13 | 24.273 | 0.000 | 0.279 | 0.598 | 22.025 | 0.000 | 0.064 | 0.801 | 0.005 | 0.942 | |
Gain asymmetry (%) | 447 | 4.02 | 7.21 | 0.056 | 0.813 | 0.009 | 0.925 | 0.437 | 0.509 | 0.000 | 0.998 | 2.006 | 0.157 | |
Area under velocity fit +(30 deg) | 447 | 8564 | 1461 | 0.442 | 0.506 | 0.680 | 0.410 | 0.092 | 0.762 | 0.490 | 0.484 | 0.834 | 0.362 | |
Area under velocity fit ‐(30 deg) | 447 | −8499 | 1315 | 4.073 | 0.044 | 2.211 | 0.138 | 3.831 | 0.051 | 2.781 | 0.096 | 0.071 | 0.790 | |
SHA 0.02 Hz | Gain average | 296 | 0.42 | 0.12 | 0.527 | 0.468 | 0.455 | 0.501 | 1.112 | 0.293 | 0.014 | 0.906 | 1.107 | 0.294 |
Asymmetry (%) | 296 | 4.24 | 10.89 | 1.861 | 0.174 | 0.024 | 0.878 | 1.644 | 0.201 | 0.030 | 0.862 | 0.001 | 0.978 | |
Phase (deg) | 296 | 21.37 | 6.20 | 0.471 | 0.493 | 0.564 | 0.453 | 0.444 | 0.506 | 1.651 | 0.200 | 0.721 | 0.396 | |
SHA 0.64 Hz | Gain average | 295 | 0.58 | 0.14 | 0.119 | 0.730 | 0.011 | 0.915 | 0.556 | 0.456 | 0.487 | 0.486 | 1.670 | 0.197 |
Asymmetry (%) | 295 | −2.57 | 7.81 | 0.218 | 0.641 | 0.164 | 0.685 | 0.658 | 0.418 | 0.135 | 0.713 | 1.294 | 0.256 | |
Phase (deg) | 295 | 4.30 | 4.60 | 0.112 | 0.738 | 5.172 | 0.024 | 0.444 | 0.506 | 1.651 | 0.200 | 0.721 | 0.396 | |
VE 0.64 Hz | Gain average | 295 | 0.98 | 0.08 | 1.751 | 0.187 | 0.026 | 0.872 | 2.530 | 0.113 | 0.627 | 0.429 | 1.308 | 0.254 |
Asymmetry (%) | 295 | 0.34 | 1.51 | 1.198 | 0.275 | 1.478 | 0.225 | 1.535 | 0.216 | 1.990 | 0.159 | 0.617 | 0.433 | |
Phase (deg) | 295 | 0.09 | 1.75 | 1.839 | 0.176 | 0.092 | 0.762 | 0.848 | 0.358 | 1.040 | 0.309 | 1.477 | 0.225 | |
VS 0.64 Hz | Gain average | 290 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.048 | 0.827 | 0.122 | 0.727 | 0.179 | 0.672 | 0.011 | 0.917 | 0.390 | 0.533 |
Asymmetry (%) | 290 | 1.29 | 11.40 | 2.649 | 0.105 | 0.407 | 0.524 | 0.003 | 0.959 | 3.586 | 0.059 | 1.050 | 0.306 | |
Phase (deg) | 290 | 12.67 | 10.05 | 0.378 | 0.539 | 2.382 | 0.124 | 0.389 | 0.533 | 1.732 | 0.189 | 0.038 | 0.845 | |
crHIT | Gain | 299 | 0.96 | 0.03 | 0.702 | 0.403 | 3.399 | 0.066 | 0.843 | 0.359 | 2.096 | 0.149 | 0.524 | 0.470 |
Asymmetry (%) | 299 | −0.17 | 2.12 | 0.003 | 0.953 | 0.405 | 0.525 | 0.333 | 0.565 | 2.170 | 0.142 | 2.431 | 0.120 | |
SVV | Mean error (deg) | 446 | 0.09 | 1.49 | 1.575 | 0.210 | 0.366 | 0.545 | 1.102 | 0.294 | 0.486 | 0.486 | 0.269 | 0.605 |
SVH | Mean error (deg) | 291 | −0.13 | 1.45 | 0.697 | 0.404 | 0.112 | 0.738 | 0.393 | 0.531 | 0.007 | 0.935 | 0.273 | 0.602 |
Note: Mean and standard deviation (SD) are presented for each test metric. Effects of age group (1), gender (2) on test metrics are calculated using one‐way ANOVA. Effects of the interaction between the age group and gender (3) are calculated using two‐way ANOVA. The t‐test‐based results examining the effect of age and gender are not reported in this paper. However, it should be noted that these results, as expected, are consistent with those of one‐way ANOVA.