Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 29;2020(9):CD006680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006680.pub3

Ott 2017.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomisation method: computer‐generated sequence
Allocation: sealed, opaque envelopes
Intervention model: parallel assignment
Blinding: single (outcomes assessor)
Participants Country: Germany
No. of participants: 155
Plain BA followed by PEB angioplasty and stenting: 48
BA and stenting: 52
Atherectomy with distal protection and bailout stenting: 55
Age (mean (years) ± SD):
PEB + stent: 69.7 ± 9.4
BA + stent: 69.2 ± 8
Atherectomy: 68.8 ± 10
Inclusion criteria: de novo stenosis > 70% or occlusion of the SFA
Exclusion criteria: acute ischaemia or acute thrombosis of the SFA; untreated ipsilateral iliac artery stenosis > 70%; previous stenting of the SFA; popliteal stenosis > 70%; severe renal insufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/minute/1.73m2); life expectancy of < 1 year; and contraindication to required medications.
Interventions Plain BA followed by PEB angioplasty and stenting versus BA and stenting versus atherectomy with distal protection and bailout stenting.
Outcomes Primary outcome: percentage diameter stenosis after 6 months, measured by angiography.
Secondary outcomes: TLR; thrombosis; ipsilateral amputation; binary restenosis; and all‐cause mortality at 6 and 24 months.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated sequence.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed, opaque envelopes opened after decision to proceed with the intervention. Randomisation performed only after guidewire passed and inclusion and exclusion criteria assessed.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk No blinding of participants or personnel.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Independent core laboratory was blinded to the treatment assignment.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk 39/155 (25%) participants did not provide primary outcome data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All primary and secondary outcomes addressed.
Other bias Low risk Clear antiplatelet protocol was the same in all arms.