Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 13.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Neurol. 2020 Apr 15;40(2):192–200. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1703000

Multiple Sclerosis in Children: Current and Emerging Concepts

J Nicholas Brenton 1, Ryan Kammeyer 2,3, Lauren Gluck 4, Teri Schreiner 2,3, Naila Makhani 4,5
PMCID: PMC8514113  NIHMSID: NIHMS1728695  PMID: 32294785

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis is being increasingly recognized and diagnosed in children. In the past several years, advances have been made in diagnosing multiple sclerosis in children, identifying new genetic and environmental risk factors, delineating underlying immunobiology, characterizing imaging findings, and implementing new treatment strategies. In this review, we discuss these advances. Future research into the determinants of multiple sclerosis in children and into new treatment options will be aided by continued international collaboration.

Keywords: multiple sclerosis, children, pediatric


Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated, neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system (CNS). While the clinical symptoms of MS most commonly manifest between 20 and 40 years of age, approximately 3 to 10% of all MS patients report that their first clinical symptoms occurred in childhood or adolescence.1,2 Most children with MS have a relapsing-remitting course that is highly active. As compared with adults with MS, rates of relapse are two to three times higher in children, and children have greater lesion volumes on MRI, especially in the posterior fossa.35

The diagnosis of MS is based on the clinical history, neurologic examination, supportive MRI findings, and ancillary laboratory data, especially cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing. An early, yet accurate, diagnosis of MS in children is important for timely initiation of treatment. With the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for a disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for MS in children (and several other MS therapies currently in the clinical trials phase), the treatment landscape for children with MS has never been more promising. This review will present an update on the risk factors and clinical features of MS in children, the most recent diagnostic criteria, advances in neuroimaging, and current approaches to the treatment of children with MS.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors

Studies have reported an incidence of MS in children between 0.26 and 2.1 per 100,000 children, depending on the geographic location.611 Some of these studies have reported a rising incidence of MS in children; however, improved awareness of the diagnosis and changes in diagnostic criteria likely impact these estimates.

Both genetic and environmental risk factors for MS in children have been identified, many of which are shared with adults.12 Children with MS are in close temporal proximity to the biological onset of the disease, which aids the study of contributing environmental exposures as children are often living in a stable environmental milieu.

Vitamin D

The epidemiologic association between increased MS incidence/prevalence and increased distance from the equator first raised the hypothesis that the risk of MS may be related to sunlight exposure. A surrogate marker of sunlight exposure is vitamin D, and low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (the circulating form of vitamin D) levels were associated with an increased risk for the subsequent diagnosis of MS in a large study of Canadian children with incident demyelination (hazard ratio: 1.1 for every 10 nmol/L decrease).13

Viral Exposures

Early exposure to common viruses likely contributes to the risk of MS. Serological evidence of remote exposure to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was more commonly detected in children with MS than in controls in one international multi-center study, and was also associated with an increased risk of a diagnosis of MS in a separate study of Canadian children with incident demyelination (hazard ratio: 2.04).13,14 In addition, previously EBV-exposed children with MS demonstrated a much higher rate of EBV reactivation compared with EBV-exposed children without MS in a longitudinal study that included monthly mouth swabs to detect EBV viral DNA.15 In contrast to EBV, evidence of remote exposure to cytomegalovirus (CMV)was associated with decreased risk of a diagnosis of MS in a study of Canadian children with incident demyelination (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.42). Similarly, serological evidence of remote CMV infection was less commonly detected in children with MS compared with controls in a U.S. study (odds ratio: 0.27).16,17 Together, these studies raise the idea that CMV exposure may be protective. Finally, two U.S. studies reported that seropositivity for herpes simplex virus 1 increased the risk for MS in children who were white and did not have the HLA-DRB1*15:01 risk allele.18,19

Smoking, Air Quality, and Household Chemicals

Second-hand smoke exposure is a risk factor for MS in children. In one population-based case–control study in France, children who had at least one parent who smoked at home had double the adjusted risk for a diagnosis of MS. Risk was higher for older children (adjusted risk ratio: 2.49), suggesting that a longer duration of exposure increases risk. In a Canadian study of children with incident demyelination, second-hand smoke exposure was reported in 37% of children with MS, compared with 30% of those with monophasic demyelination.20,21

A recent U.S. case–control study reported an increased risk of MS in children exposed to pesticides (odds ratio: 2.18).22 In another U.S. study, exposure to air pollutants (particulate fine matter, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and lead) was associated with an increased risk of MS, but only in children living within 20 miles of an MS center.23

Birth Factors

Maternal health and perinatal/postnatal factors may influence the risk for MS in children. A large U.S. case–control study reported that maternal illness during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of a diagnosis of MS in childhood (adjusted odds ratio: 2.25). Cesarean delivery was associated with a reduced risk of a subsequent diagnosis of MS (adjusted odds ratio: 0.40).22 While this study did not demonstrate an association of infant breastfeeding and risk of MS, a separate study showed that a lack of infant breastfeeding was associated with an increased risk for a future diagnosis of MS (odds ratio: 4.43).24

Sex Hormones

When the clinical onset of MS occurs prior to puberty, the occurrence of MS is equal between sexes; however, MS is two to three times more common in women after puberty, suggesting a role for sex hormones.25 One case–control and one longitudinal study showed that a later age of menarche was associated with a lower risk of a diagnosis of MS in childhood.26,27 In children with established MS, a 2.4 increased rate of relapses was reported for boys with onset of MS symptoms in the peripubertal period compared with postpuberty.28 Similarly, relapse rates were higher in the perimenarche period compared with postmenarche (incidence rate ratio: 8.5) in a study of girls with MS.29

Obesity and Diet

Obesity may be related to risk of MS in children. Two case–control studies reported increased body mass index in children with MS compared with controls, and this relationship was especially strong in girls.27,30 In addition, one case–control study reported that the body mass index trajectories of children with MS were elevated not only at diagnosis but also in early childhood, years before the clinical onset of the disease.31 Adipokines secreted by adipocytes are involved in immune regulation.32 Obesity also serves as a risk factor for low vitamin D status33 and earlier age of menarche.27 While there is significant interest in dietary factors (e.g., salt intake) and risk of MS in children, no definite associations have been reported.34,35

Genetic Factors

Alterations in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) contribute to risk of MS. Specifically, the HLA-DRB1*15:01 allele conferred increased risk of a diagnosis of MS in children presenting with incident demyelination (odds ratio: 2.7).13,36 The risk conferred by HLA alleles may be influenced by ancestry (e.g., European, African, Hispanic).37

Several non-HLA single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with an increased risk of MS in children, many of which are identical to SNPs detected in adults.38 Many of these SNPs are implicated in the adaptive or innate immune pathways.

Gene–Environment Interactions

The interplay between genetics and environmental risk factors is important to consider. As an example, the HLA alleles may serve to modify the risk for pediatric MS when considered in the context of passive smoke exposure,21 vitamin D status,39 obesity,40 and certain viral exposures.18

Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis in Children

As in adults, the diagnosis of MS in children requires evidence of CNS demyelination that is separated in both space and in time. A child with two or more episodes of neurological symptoms characteristic of MS localizing to different areas of the CNS meets the dissemination in space (DIS) and time (DIT) criteria clinically. Diagnostic criteria for MS in adults outline MRI and laboratory factors that may be used to demonstrate DIS or DIT in an individual with only one clinical episode (Table 1).41 These criteria had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 95% when applied in a longitudinal cohort of children with incident demyelination, supporting their application in children.42 Caution needs to be employed when using these diagnostic criteria in young children (<11 years) as many such children meet the clinical definition of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), which is typically monophasic. Therefore, a diagnosis of MS in a child with ADEM requires one or more additional non-ADEM clinical episode and fulfillment of DIS and DIT criteria.41

Table 1.

MRI and laboratory criteria for a diagnosis of multiple sclerosisa

Dissemination in space Dissemination in time
Lesions in two or more of the following locations:
  1. Periventricular

  2. Juxtacortical

  3. Infratentorial

  4. Spinal cord

Any of the following:
  1. ≥ 1 enhancing lesion

  2. New lesions on subsequent MRI

  3. ≥ 2 oligoclonal bands present in cerebrospinal fluid (but not serum)

Abbreviation: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

a

These criteria do not apply to children with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), in whom a second non-ADEM clinical neurological event is needed to confirm a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Imaging Characteristics of Children with Multiple Sclerosis

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Inflammatory Activity

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is important both to support a diagnosis of MS in children and to provide insights into underlying biology. While one study found similar T2 lesion volumes in children and adults with MS matched for disease duration,43 two other studies reported either higher T2 lesion numbers or volumes in children with MS compared with adults, especially in the posterior fossa.5,44 In one study, children also had a greater number of enhancing lesions.44 In the same study, follow-up MRIs in children with MS were more likely to demonstrate new lesions and enhancing lesions, suggesting a more aggressive radiological course in children, which parallels known differences in clinical disease activity. A representative MR image from a child with MS is given in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Representative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance images from a child with multiple sclerosis.

Structural and Functional MRI Analyses

A worrisome finding for clinicians is that children with MS demonstrate less-than-expected brain growth. One study of Canadian children and one from France reported that children with MS have reduced whole brain volumes when assessed at a single time point and lower-than-expected brain growth over multiple time points compared with matched controls.45,46 In the Canadian study, reduced regional brain growth in the thalamus was especially marked. Inconsistent associations have been reported between gray matter involvement and white matter lesion volume.46,47

Ultra-high field MRI at 7T (Tesla) and advanced MRI sequences performed at 3T provide additional information about cortical gray matter involvement in pediatric MS. Cortical lesions can be seen on MRI in children with MS, despite their young age, particularly in intracortical and leukocortical locations.48,49 No strong associations have been established between cognitive function and the presence of cortical lesions on MRI in children with MS.47,50 The clinical correlates of cortical lesions in children are an area for future study.

Beyond traditional MRI, advanced imaging modalities provide more information about structural white matter tract integrity and brain function. These techniques include diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), and functional MRI (fMRI).

DTI can detect decreased microstructural integrity of both lesional and normal appearing white matter in children with MS, based on impaired water diffusivity. In children with MS, these microstructural alterations have been demonstrated in nonlesional white matter, especially in the corpus callosum, a heavily myelinated structure.5154 Studies have consistently shown both decreased fractional anisotropy and more variable changes in radial and axial diffusivity, which indicate axonal loss and demyelination, respectively.52

MTR is an indicator of remyelination and repair. Studies have reported that younger children with MS show greater MTR recovery within lesions than adults55 and even older adolescents.56 This finding may correlate with the modest physical disability often observed in pediatric MS patients despite high lesion number and volumes on MRI.

fMRI can be used to learn about functional reorganization in pediatric MS patients. In one study, children with MS had increased (rather than decreased) resting-state functional connectivity in the default and frontoparietal networks, similar to cognitively intact adults with early MS.53 The underlying adaptive properties of this finding is unclear, but may be a protective mechanism in pediatric MS patients.57 However, the adult MS literature indicates that this apparent plasticity is lost over time and that later functional reorganization may not be beneficial.53,57,58

Immunology of Multiple Sclerosis in Children

MS has traditionally been thought of as a T-cell–mediated disease, precipitated by an abnormal balance between regulatory T-cells (Treg) and CNS-reactive effector T cells. In a German study that compared circulating T-cell profiles from children with MS to age-matched controls, children with MS had a lower proportion of circulating naive T-cells, a higher proportion of memory T-cells, and reduced suppressive capacity of Treg subsets.59 Of note, the ratio of naive to memory T-cells in children with MS was similar to those of controls 20 to 30 years older in age, suggesting that there may be a premature impairment in the ability of the thymus to produce new T-cells in children with MS. A U.S. study reported that T-cell proliferation in response to exposure to myelin peptides was increased in 10 pediatric MS patients, relative to 10 age-matched controls and 10 adults with MS, suggesting an increased peripheral immune response to myelin-derived antigens.60 Finally, one study showed that the serum T-cell cytokine signatures from pediatric MS patients differed from healthy controls, with certain serum cytokines (IL-10, IL-21, IL-23, and IL-27) predicting MS relapse.61

B-cell immunology plays an important role in mediating inflammatory CNS disease. Circulating serum antibodies against myelin basic protein were not elevated in children with MS compared with controls in one study.62 In a Canadian study of children with incident demyelination, CSF antibodies against nodal/paranodal assembling proteins were more commonly present in children who later were diagnosed with MS. Antibodies toward myelin oligodendrocyte (MOG) protein are more commonly found in children with ADEM compared with those diagnosed with MS.63 Antibodies to KIR4.1, an inward rectifying potassium channel, were detected in more than half of children with incident-acquired demyelination of the CNS in a German study.64

Treatment of Children with Multiple Sclerosis

After a diagnosis of MS has been made, initiation of a DMT is recommended to decrease relapses and to reduce the accumulation of disability from the disease. Initiation of DMT in children requires the coordinated efforts of a multidisciplinary team to address the practical issues of administration, emphasize the importance of adherence to therapy, address potential barriers, and assess the psychological burden of a chronic disease.

Disease-Modifying Therapies

DMTs come in the form of injections, infusions, and oral medications. While there are several DMTs approved by the FDA for treatment of adults with MS, there are few randomized controlled trials of these medications for children (Table 2). In addition, there is only one DMT approved by the FDA for use in children with MS. The PARADIGMS study was a phase 3 study of fingolimod versus weekly interferon-β1a.65 The annualized relapse rate was 82% lower with fingolimod than interferon-β1a, and there were fewer new and enlarging T2 lesions on MRI. Clinical trials are underway for dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide. Future studies are anticipated for ocrelizumab and cladribine. Until these studies in children are completed, adult data inform their off-label use in children. DMTs with evidence only in adults include only siponimod, cladribine, and ocrelizumab.

Table 2.

Treatment options for children with multiple sclerosis

Disease-modifying therapy Method of administration73 Mechanism of action73 Dosing Side effects Monitoring73 ARR MRI response Level of evidence in children
INF-β1a Injectable Polypeptide causing inhibition of T-lymphocyte proliferation, reduced migration of inflammation cells across the blood-brain barrier (produced in mammalian cell lines) 22–44 μg three times a week74 Injection site reactions (28%), Influenza-like symptoms (24%), hepatic disorders (14%), blood cell disorders (5%), allergic reactions (2%), seizure (2%), thyroid disorder (1%), autoimmune disorders (1%)74 Liver function, blood counts 0.4774 0.744–0.795 (US), 0.2313–0.426 (other countries)75 1.38 (high-dose IFN-β)76 0.4–0.977 New or enlarging T2 lesions (annualized rate): 9.2765 Retrospective studies,7476 open label prospective77
INF-β1b Injectable Similar to β1a, but produced in bacterial expression systems (not glycosylated) 250 μg every other day Injection-site reactions, influenza-like symptoms, elevated liver enzymes Liver function, blood counts at initiation and every 6 mo 50% reduction in ARR; 0.67 for treatment < 1 y None in children Retrospective study78
Glatiramer acetate Injectable Synthetic peptides similar to myelin basic protein, promote Th2 deviation under development of Th2 glatiramer acetate reactive CD4+ T-cells 20 mg daily or 40 mg three times a week76 Dyspnea (7%), skin injection reaction (13%) Adults: lipoatrophy (permanent)73 None 0.277 0.5376 Adults: CELs per MRI scan at 1 y: 0.41 New or enlarging T2 lesions at 1 y:1.4979 Retrospective study,76 open label prospective study77
Fingolimod Oral Sphingosine1-phosphate receptor modulator, inhibits ability of autoreactive lymphocytes to leave lymph nodes 0.5 mg daily (0.25 mg if <40 kg)65 Headache (32%), URI (38%), leukopenia (14%), convulsions (6%)65; Adults: transient bradycardia/AV block with first dose, macular edema, elevated liver enzymes, one death from fulminant primary varicella-zoster infection73 Monitor with electro-cardiogram for 6 h after the first dose. Liver function, routine eye exams. Screening for varicella-zoster antibodies before initiation 0.1265 0.14–0.2780 New or enlarging T2 lesions (annualized rate): 4.4–7.565,80 Randomized controlled trials: age 10–17 y old,65 age < 20 y old80
Dimethyl fumarate Oral Activation of the nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 transcriptional pathway 240 mg twice a day81 Flushing (60%), GI symptoms (54%), rash (23%), malaise (15%), treatment discontinuation from side effects (23%)81 Adults: reports of PML in JCV-positive patients with prolonged lymphopenia73 Liver function, blood counts. JCV antibodies if prolonged lymphopenia (<500 cells/mm3) 0.681 0.882 New T2 lesions at 1 y: 33% 3-fold reduction in new T2 lesions82 Retrospective study,81 open label phase II trial (FOCUS),82 Phase III trial, (NCT02283853), ongoing
Teriflunomide Oral Inhibits de novo pyrimidine synthesis, reducing circulating lymphocytes 14 mg daily73 Headache (16%), hepatic enzyme elevation (15%), diarrhea (14%), hair thinning (14%), serious infections (3%)83 Liver function, blood counts, blood pressure Adults: 31–35% reduction in ARR83 Adults: decrease in CELs compared with placebo: 80.4%84 Phase III trial (NCT02201108, “TERIKIDS”), ongoing
Mitoxantrone Infusion Synthetic anthracenedione derivative, inhibits proliferating immune cells and induces apoptosis 20 mg (10 mg if <12 y old) monthly for 2–4 doses85 Cardiotoxicity (palpitations or cardiomyopathy—26%), nausea/vomiting (74%), fatigue (53%), alopecia (47%). Mild leukopenia (5%), transient amenorrhea (11%)85 Adults: therapy-related leukemia, teratogenicity73 Liver function, blood counts. Echocardiograms before, during, and after treatment 0.4785 New T2 lesions at the end of treatment duration: 28.5%85 Retrospective study85
Natalizumab Infusion Monoclonal antibody, prevents adherence of activated leucocytes to inflamed endothelium 300 mg every month86 Headache (6%), GI symptoms (4%)69 URI symptoms (9%)87 PML JCV antibodies every 6 mo, liver function, blood counts 0.0686 0.187 0.3888 0.489 MRI activity: 12.5%86 New T2 or CELs at 1 y: 7%87 Open label prospective study8687 Retrospective study8889
Rituximab Infusion Monoclonal antibody against CD20+ B cells90 375 or 500 mg/m2 (up to 1,000 mg) Initiation; two doses, 2 wk apart Maintenance: every 6 mo90,91 Rash (5%), hypotension (4%)69 Lymphopenia (41%), hypogammaglobulinemia (22%), anaphylaxis (2%), severe infection or death from infection (2.8%)90 CD19 every 6 mo, liver function, blood counts, immunoglobulin levels Adults: 0.0491 Adults: decrease in CELs per MRI: 0.8–0.0591 Observational cohort study69
Cyclophosphamide Infusion Alkylating agent: interferes with DNA transcription in rapidly dividing cells Monthly based on lymphocyte counts +/− preceding induction Nausea/vomiting (88%), lymphopenia (100%), anemia (63%), thrombocytopenia (19%), hematuria (6%), alopecia/hair thinning (59%), menstrual irregularities (29%), infection (18%), paresthesias (6%), central line complications (6%), fatigue (12%), urticarial (6%), myalgias (6%), amenorrhea (18%), sterility (6%), osteoporosis (12%), bladder cancer (6%)92 Liver function, blood counts, urinalysis 1.192 75% with new T2 lesions at 1 y92 Retrospective study of children with highly active MS92

Abbreviations: ARR, annualized relapse rate; CELs, contrast enhancing lesions; GI, gastrointestinal; INF, interferon; JCV, John Cunningham virus; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MS, multiple sclerosis; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; URI, upper respiratory infection.

Several factors need to be considered when choosing DMTs, including likelihood of compliance, exposure status to John Cunningham virus (given its association with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy), and the individual risks/benefits. For many years, injectable DMTs were considered first-line therapies. However, children face several logistical and social factors that decrease compliance with, or give a negative perception of, injectable DMTs.66

There are two main approaches to DMT initiation and switching of DMTs: escalating therapy versus initiating early high-efficacy therapy. Escalating therapy consists of starting with less potent therapies with close follow-up, with a switch to higher-efficacy therapies with any subsequent relapses or radiographic disease progression. Early high-efficacy therapy consists of the early initiation of potent DMTs, with the goal of inducing and maintaining remission early.67 Arguments for the use of early high-efficacy therapy in children include the higher relapse rate,3 higher volume of brain lesions on MRI,5 and lower prevalence of NEDA with treatment (no evidence of disease activity—clinical or radiographic).68 However, many of the DMTs commonly used in adults have limited evidence in children. Therefore, careful consideration and discussion with families of potential risks and benefits are needed. While treatment patterns may vary, practice patterns in the United States have been evolving toward the earlier use of more potent therapies earlier in the disease course.69

Emerging Concepts and Future Directions for Treatment

In addition to much-needed additional randomized controlled trials for children, a greater understanding of how DMTs alter the developing immune system and their long-term effects is imperative. We also need to better understand how lifestyle factors may influence the course of disease. Vitamin D, exercise, and dietary factors may have a favorable effect on relapse rate. For example, for vitamin D, one study reported that every 10 ng/mL increase in adjusted serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was associated with a 34% decrease in relapse rate.70 Trials of dietary supplements have not been conducted independent of concurrent DMT use, and thus cannot be recommended as monotherapies. In one study, increased intake of fat, especially saturated fat, was associated with an increased risk of relapse. Conversely, increased consumption of vegetables was associated with a decreased risk of relapse.71 In another study, higher levels of strenuous physical activity were associated with both reduced T2 lesion volumes on MRI and lower relapse rates.72 Together, these findings suggest that certain diet and lifestyle interventions may have a benefit. This is an area for future study.

Conclusion

Multiple sclerosis in children is being increasingly diagnosed worldwide. This has been aided by improved recognition of the disease, consensus diagnostic criteria, and improved imaging. The past several years have led to an improved understanding of factors that contribute to the risk of MS in children and the pathobiology of the disease. Therapeutic options for MS in children are increasing; however, clinical trials for new and emerging treatments are still needed for children. Multicenter collaborations such as those fostered by the International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group will aid in improving future clinical care and advancing research.

Funding

Dr. Makhani was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke (NINDS) (grant number: K23NS101099).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

N.M. reports grants from NIH/NINDS, during the conduct of the study.

References

  • 1.Simone IL, Carrara D, Tortorella C, et al. Course and prognosis in early-onset MS: comparison with adult-onset forms. Neurology 2002;59(12):1922–1928 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chitnis T, Glanz B, Jaffin S, Healy B. Demographics of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis in an MS center population from the Northeastern United States. Mult Scler 2009;15(05):627–631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gorman MP, Healy BC, Polgar-Turcsanyi M, Chitnis T. Increased relapse rate in pediatric-onset compared with adult-onset multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2009;66(01):54–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Benson LA, Healy BC, Gorman MP, et al. Elevated relapse rates in pediatric compared to adult MS persist for at least 6 years. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2014;3(02):186–193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ghassemi R, Narayanan S, Banwell B, Sled JG, Shroff M, Arnold DL; Canadian Pediatric Demyelinating Disease Network. Quantitative determination of regional lesion volume and distribution in children and adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 2014;9(02):e85741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alroughani R, Akhtar S, Ahmed SF, Behbehani R, Al-Abkal J, Al-Hashel J. Incidence and prevalence of pediatric onset multiple sclerosis in Kuwait: 1994–2013. J Neurol Sci 2015;353(1–2):107–110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.de Mol CL, Wong YYM, van Pelt ED, et al. Incidence and outcome of acquired demyelinating syndromes in Dutch children: update of a nationwide and prospective study. J Neurol 2018;265(06):1310–1319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bizjak N, Osredkar D, Perković Benedik M, Šega Jazbec S. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of multiple sclerosis in paediatric population in Slovenia: a descriptive nation-wide study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2017;18:56–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gudbjornsson BT, Haraldsson Á, Einarsdóttir H, Thorarensen Ó. Nationwide incidence of acquired central nervous system demyelination in Icelandic children. Pediatr Neurol 2015;53(06): 503–507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Boesen MS, Magyari M, Koch-Henriksen N, et al. Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis and other acquired demyelinating syndromes of the central nervous system in Denmark during 1977–2015: a nationwide population-based incidence study. Mult Scler 2018; 24(08):1077–1086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Marrie RA, O’Mahony J, Maxwell C, et al. ; Canadian Pediatric Demyelinating Disease Network. Incidence and prevalence of MS in children: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada. Neurology 2018;91(17):e1579–e1590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cappa R, Theroux L, Brenton JN. Pediatric multiple sclerosis: genes, environment, and a comprehensive therapeutic approach. Pediatr Neurol 2017;75:17–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Banwell B, Bar-Or A, Arnold DL, et al. Clinical, environmental, and genetic determinants of multiple sclerosis in children with acute demyelination: a prospective national cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2011;10(05):436–445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Banwell B, Krupp L, Kennedy J, et al. Clinical features and viral serologies in children with multiple sclerosis: a multinational observational study. Lancet Neurol 2007;6(09):773–781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yea C, Tellier R, Chong P, et al. ; Canadian Pediatric Demyelinating Disease Network. Epstein-Barr virus in oral shedding of children with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2013;81(16):1392–1399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Makhani N, Banwell B, Tellier R, et al. ; Canadian Pediatric Demyelinating Disease Network. Viral exposures and MS outcome in a prospective cohort of children with acquired demyelination. Mult Scler 2016;22(03):385–388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Waubant E, Mowry EM, Krupp L, et al. ; US Pediatric MS Network. Common viruses associated with lower pediatric multiple sclerosis risk. Neurology 2011;76(23):1989–1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Waubant E, Mowry EM, Krupp L, et al. Antibody response to common viruses and human leukocyte antigen-DRB1 in pediatric multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2013;19(07):891–895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nourbakhsh B, Rutatangwa A, Waltz M, et al. ; US Network of Pediatric MS Centers. Heterogeneity in association of remote herpesvirus infections and pediatric MS. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2018;5(10):1222–1228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mikaeloff Y, Caridade G, Tardieu M, Suissa S; KIDSEP Study Group. Parental smoking at home and the risk of childhood-onset multiple sclerosis in children. Brain 2007;130(Pt 10): 2589–2595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lavery AM, Collins BN, Waldman AT, et al. The contribution of secondhand tobacco smoke exposure to pediatric multiple sclerosis risk. Mult Scler 2019;25(04):515–522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Graves JS, Chitnis T, Weinstock-Guttman B, et al. ; Network of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Centers. Maternal and perinatal exposures are associated with risk for pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis. Pediatrics 2017;139(04):e20162838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lavery AM, Waubant E, Casper TC, et al. Urban air quality and associations with pediatric multiple sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2018;5(10):1146–1153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brenton JN, Engel CE, Sohn M-W, Goldman MD. Breastfeeding during infancy is associated with a lower future risk of pediatric multiple sclerosis. Pediatr Neurol 2017;77:67–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Huppke B, Ellenberger D, Rosewich H, Friede T, Gärtner J, Huppke P. Clinical presentation of pediatric multiple sclerosis before puberty. Eur J Neurol 2014;21(03):441–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ahn JJ, O’Mahony J, Moshkova M, et al. Puberty in females enhances the risk of an outcome of multiple sclerosis in children and the development of central nervous system autoimmunity in mice. Mult Scler 2015;21(06):735–748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chitnis T, Graves J, Weinstock-Guttman B, et al. ; U.S. Network of Pediatric MS Centers. Distinct effects of obesity and puberty on risk and age at onset of pediatric MS. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2016; 3(12):897–907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Young B, Waubant E, Lulu S, Graves J. Puberty onset and pediatric multiple sclerosis activity in boys. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019; 27:184–187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lulu S, Graves J, Waubant E. Menarche increases relapse risk in pediatric multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2016;22(02):193–200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Langer-Gould A, Brara SM, Beaber BE, Koebnick C. Childhood obesity and risk of pediatric multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome. Neurology 2013;80(06):548–552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brenton JN, Woolbright E, Briscoe-Abath C, Qureshi A, Conaway M, Goldman MD. Body mass index trajectories in pediatric multiple sclerosis. Dev Med Child Neurol 2019;61(11):1289–1294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Versini M, Jeandel PY, Rosenthal E, Shoenfeld Y. Obesity in autoimmune diseases: not a passive bystander. Autoimmun Rev 2014;13(09):981–1000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brenton JN, Koenig S, Goldman MD. Vitamin D status and age of onset of demyelinating disease. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2014;3(06):684–688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pakpoor J, Seminatore B, Graves JS, et al. ; US Network of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Centers. Dietary factors and pediatric multiple sclerosis: a case-control study. Mult Scler 2018;24(08):1067–1076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.McDonald J, Graves J, Waldman A, et al. A case-control study of dietary salt intake in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2016;6:87–92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Disanto G, Magalhaes S, Handel AE, et al. ; Canadian Pediatric Demyelinating Disease Network. HLA-DRB1 confers increased risk of pediatric-onset MS in children with acquired demyelination. Neurology 2011;76(09):781–786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chi C, Shao X, Rhead B, et al. Admixture mapping reveals evidence of differential multiple sclerosis risk by genetic ancestry. PLoS Genet 2019;15(01):e1007808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.van Pelt ED, Mescheriakova JY, Makhani N, et al. Risk genes associated with pediatric-onset MS but not with monophasic acquired CNS demyelination. Neurology 2013;81(23):1996–2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ramagopalan SV, Maugeri NJ, Handunnetthi L, et al. Expression of the multiple sclerosis-associated MHC class II Allele HLA-DRB1*1501 is regulated by vitamin D. PLoS Genet 2009;5(02): e1000369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gianfrancesco MA, Stridh P, Rhead B, et al. ; Network of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Centers. Evidence for a causal relationship between low vitamin D, high BMI, and pediatric-onset MS. Neurology 2017;88(17):1623–1629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018;17(02):162–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fadda G, Brown RA, Longoni G, et al. ; Canadian Pediatric Demyelinating Disease Network. MRI and laboratory features and the performance of international criteria in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in children and adolescents: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018;2(03):191–204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yeh EA, Weinstock-Guttman B, Ramanathan M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of children and adults with paediatric-onset multiple sclerosis. Brain 2009;132(Pt 12):3392–3400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Waubant E, Chabas D, Okuda DT, et al. Difference in disease burden and activity in pediatric patients on brain magnetic resonance imaging at time of multiple sclerosis onset vs adults. Arch Neurol 2009;66(08):967–971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bartels F, Nobis K, Cooper G, et al. Childhood multiple sclerosis is associated with reduced brain volumes at first clinical presentation and brain growth failure. Mult Scler 2019;25(07):927–936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Aubert-Broche B, Fonov V, Narayanan S, et al. ; Canadian Pediatric Demyelinating Disease Network. Onset of multiple sclerosis before adulthood leads to failure of age-expected brain growth. Neurology 2014;83(23):2140–2146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.De Meo E, Meani A, Moiola L, et al. Dynamic gray matter volume changes in pediatric multiple sclerosis: a 3.5 year MRI study. Neurology 2019;92(15):e1709–e1723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Datta R, Sethi V, Ly S, et al. 7T MRI visualization of cortical lesions in adolescents and young adults with pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2017;27(05):447–452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Maranzano J, Till C, Assemlal HE, et al. Detection and clinical correlation of leukocortical lesions in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis on multi-contrast MRI. Mult Scler 2019;25(07):980–986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rocca MA, De Meo E, Amato MP, et al. Cognitive impairment in paediatric multiple sclerosis patients is not related to cortical lesions. Mult Scler 2015;21(07):956–959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tillema JM, Leach J, Pirko I. Non-lesional white matter changes in pediatric multiple sclerosis and monophasic demyelinating disorders. Mult Scler 2012;18(12):1754–1759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Blaschek A, Keeser D, Müller S, et al. Early white matter changes in childhood multiple sclerosis: a diffusion tensor imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34(10):2015–2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Akbar N, Giorgio A, Till C, et al. Alterations in functional and structural connectivity in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 2016;11(01):e0145906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Aung WY, Massoumzadeh P, Najmi S, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging as a biomarker to differentiate acute disseminated encephalomyelitis from multiple sclerosis at first demyelination. Pediatr Neurol 2018;78:70–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hintzen RQ, Dale RC, Neuteboom RF, Mar S, Banwell B. Pediatric acquired CNS demyelinating syndromes: features associated with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2016;87(09, Suppl 2):S67–S73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Brown RA, Narayanan S, Banwell B, Arnold DL; Canadian Pediatric Demyelinating Disease Network. Magnetization transfer ratio recovery in new lesions decreases during adolescence in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis patients. Neuroimage Clin 2014; 6:237–242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rocca MA, Absinta M, Moiola L, et al. Functional and structural connectivity of the motor network in pediatric and adult-onset relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Radiology 2010;254(02): 541–550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rocca MA, De Meo E, Filippi M. Functional MRI in investigating cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 2016;134(Suppl 200):39–46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Balint B, Haas J, Schwarz A, et al. T-cell homeostasis in pediatric multiple sclerosis: old cells in young patients. Neurology 2013;81(09):784–792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Vargas-Lowy D, Kivisäkk P, Gandhi R, et al. Increased Th17 response to myelin peptides in pediatric MS. Clin Immunol 2013;146(03):176–184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cala CM, Moseley CE, Steele C, et al. T cell cytokine signatures: biomarkers in pediatric multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 2016; 297:1–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.O’Connor KC, Lopez-Amaya C, Gagne D, et al. Anti-myelin antibodies modulate clinical expression of childhood multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 2010;223(1–2):92–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hennes EM, Baumann M, Schanda K, et al. ; BIOMARKER Study Group. Prognostic relevance of MOG antibodies in children with an acquired demyelinating syndrome. Neurology 2017;89(09): 900–908 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kraus V, Srivastava R, Kalluri SR, et al. Potassium channel KIR4.1-specific antibodies in children with acquired demyelinating CNS disease. Neurology 2014;82(06):470–473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chitnis T, Arnold DL, Banwell B, et al. ; PARADIGMS Study Group. Trial of fingolimod versus interferon beta-1a in pediatric multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2018;379(11):1017–1027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Thannhauser JE, Mah JK, Metz LM. Adherence of adolescents to multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy. Pediatr Neurol 2009;41(02):119–123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.McGinley M, Rossman IT. Bringing the HEET: the argument for high-efficacy early treatment for pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics 2017;14(04):985–998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rensel M, Rossman I, Moodley M. NEDA in pediatric MS, is it attainable? Neurology 2016;86(16 Suppl):P2.128 [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Krysko KM, Graves J, Rensel M, et al. ; US Network of Pediatric MS Centers. Use of newer disease-modifying therapies in pediatric multiple sclerosis in the US. Neurology 2018;91(19):e1778–e1787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mowry EM, Krupp LB, Milazzo M, et al. Vitamin D status is associated with relapse rate in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2010;67(05):618–624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Azary S, Schreiner T, Graves J, et al. Contribution of dietary intake to relapse rate in early paediatric multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018;89(01):28–33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Grover SA, Aubert-Broche B, Fetco D, et al. Lower physical activity is associated with higher disease burden in pediatric multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2015;85(19):1663–1669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Torkildsen Ø, Myhr KM, Bø L. Disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis - a review of approved medications. Eur J Neurol 2016;23(Suppl 1):18–27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Tenembaum SN, Banwell B, Pohl D, et al. ; REPLAY Study Group. Subcutaneous interferon Beta-1a in pediatric multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study. J Child Neurol 2013;28(07):849–856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Krupp LB, Pohl D, Ghezzi A, et al. ; REPLAY Study Group. Subcutaneous interferon β−1a in pediatric patients with multiple sclerosis: regional differences in clinical features, disease management, and treatment outcomes in an international retrospective study. J Neurol Sci 2016;363:33–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Fragomeni MO, Bichuetti DB, Oliveira EML. Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis in Brazilian patients: clinical features, treatment response and comparison to pediatric neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2018;25(June): 138–142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ghezzi A, Amato MP, Annovazzi P, et al. ; ITEMS (Immunomodulatory Treatment of Early-onset MS) Group. Long-term results of immunomodulatory treatment in children and adolescents with multiple sclerosis: the Italian experience. Neurol Sci 2009;30(03):193–199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Banwell B, Reder AT, Krupp L, et al. Safety and tolerability of interferon beta-1b in pediatric multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2006;66(04):472–476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Khan O, Rieckmann P, Boyko A, et al. Efficacy and safety of a three-times-weekly dosing regimen of glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: 3-year results of the Glatiramer Acetate Low-Frequency Administration open-label extension study. Mult Scler 2017;23(06):818–829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gärtner J, Chitnis T, Ghezzi A, et al. Relapse rate and MRI activity in young adult patients with multiple sclerosis: a post hoc analysis of phase 3 fingolimod trials. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2018;4(02):2055217318778610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Makhani N, Schreiner T. Oral dimethyl fumarate in children with multiple sclerosis: a dual-center study. Pediatr Neurol 2016; 57:101–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Alroughani R, Das R, Penner N, Pultz J, Taylor C, Eraly S. Safety and efficacy of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate in pediatric patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (FOCUS). Pediatr Neurol 2018;83:19–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Comi G, Cohen JA, Arnold DL, Wynn D, Filippi M; FORTE Study Group. Phase III dose-comparison study of glatiramer acetate for multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2011;69(01):75–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA, Nelson F, et al. ; Teriflunomide Multiple Sclerosis Oral (TEMSO) Trial Group. Magnetic resonance imaging outcomes from a phase III trial of teriflunomide. Mult Scler 2013; 19(10):1310–1319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Etemadifar M, Afzali P, Abtahi S-H, et al. Safety and efficacy of mitoxantrone in pediatric patients with aggressive multiple sclerosis. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2014;18(02):119–125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Alroughani R, Ahmed SF, Behbehani R, Al-Hashel J. The use of natalizumab in pediatric patients with active relapsing multiple sclerosis: a prospective study. Pediatr Neurol 2017;70:56–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ghezzi A, Moiola L, Pozzilli C, et al. ; MS Study Group-Italian Society of Neurology. Natalizumab in the pediatric MS population: results of the Italian registry. BMC Neurol 2015;15(174):174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Arnal-Garcia C, García-Montero MR, Málaga I, et al. Natalizumab use in pediatric patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2013;17(01):50–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kornek B, Aboul-Enein F, Rostasy K, et al. Natalizumab therapy for highly active pediatric multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 2013;70(04):469–475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Dale RC, Brilot F, Duffy LV, et al. Utility and safety of rituximab in pediatric autoimmune and inflammatory CNS disease. Neurology 2014;83(02):142–150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Salzer J, Svenningsson R, Alping P, et al. Rituximab in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective observational study on safety and efficacy. Neurology 2016;87(20):2074–2081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Makhani N, Gorman MP, Branson HM, Stazzone L, Banwell BL, Chitnis T. Cyclophosphamide therapy in pediatric multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2009;72(24):2076–2082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES