Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 13.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Behav Evol. 2012 Sep 26;80(4):244–253. doi: 10.1159/000341899

Table 2.

Maternal behavior of Peromyscus mice reared by biological (control) or foster parents

Retrieving pups Nest building Components of the HNGI score
huddling nursing grooming in nest
White-footed mice
 Control   3.4±1.6 24.0±9.3a 562.9±149.6b 511.9±154.7b 11.2±3.5b 589.1±154.1b
 In-fostered   5.8±4.0 59.2±49.3a 610.5±142.9b 502.8±150.3b 21.5±10.0b 622.8±131.6b
 Cross-fostered   5.7±1.7 63.1±44.3a 358.1±78.7b 293.8±76.3b 32.1±15.5b 429.1 ±67.3b
California mice
 Control   6.4±3.3 10.0±5.8c 592.7±57.7d 558.4±62.3d 71.8±11.3d 561.3±56.4d
 In-fostered 15.3±8.4   5.5±3.8c 530.9±58.0d 501.1±55.5d 98.5±14.6d 596.2±66.6d
 Cross-fostered   4.1±2.3   4.7±3.4c 647.3±95.9d 566.3±81.9d 95.8±15.0d 655.5±82.5d

All data are presented in seconds. The HNGI score is divided into its four component variables. Data are presented as raw means ± SE. Comparisons were made between cross-fostered and in-fostered animals and between in-fostered and control animals. Despite species differences in the HNGI score (labeled with superscripts b and d; U = 181, Z = 2.33, p = 0.02) and nest building (labeled with superscripts a and c; U = 164, Z = −2.67, p = 0.008), cross-fostering did not affect maternal behavior.