Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 24;28(6):1225–1234. doi: 10.1007/s12282-021-01250-z

Table 3.

Results of uni- and multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard model) showing correlation of RFS with clinicopathological factors in patients with breast cancer

Variable Univariate Multivariate
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
pStage (vs. Stage I) 2.60 1.01–6.69 0.05 1.72 0.48–6.10 0.40
pLN (vs. negative) 2.55 1.08–6.01 0.03 1.65 0.52–5.17 0.39
Pathological tumor size (vs. T1) 1.27 0.53–3.07 0.59
Grade (vs. 1–2) 1.14 0.46–2.82 0.78
ER (vs. positive) 1.33 0.54–3.30 0.54
PR (vs. positive) 1.54 0.65–3.67 0.32
HER2 (vs. negative) 0.46 0.06–3.39 0.44
Ki-67 (vs. < 10%) 4.15 0.95–18.1 0.06
Adjuvant chemotherapy (vs. non-therapy) 1.47 0.62–3.51 0.38
Adjuvant endocrinetherapy (vs. non-therapy) 0.97 0.38–2.50 0.95
TP53 status by signature (vs. wild-type) 3.96 1.45–10.8 0.01 3.73 1.36–10.20 0.01

pStage pathological stage, pLN pathological lymph node, ER estrogen receptor, PgR progesterone receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval