Table 2.
Epidemiology and evaluation of sexual dysfunction after pelvic ring injury
Studies | Number of patients | Sexual dysfunction | Evaluation scale | Dysfunction quantification | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Erectile dysfunction | Ejaculation disturbances | Dyspareunia | Percentage | IIEF | ASEX | Other | Mild | Mild to moderate | Moderate | Severe | ||
Pohlemann 1996 | 58 | 5 | 1 | 10.3% | _ | _ | Ad hoc questionnaire | |||||
Malavaud 2000 | 46 | 11 | _ | 23.9% | X | _ | _ | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | |
Bellabarba 2003 | 10 | 1 | _ | 2 | 30.0% | _ | _ | Ad hoc questionnaire | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Baessler 2004 | 24 | _ | _ | 8 | 30.0% | _ | _ | Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Wright 2006 | 298 | 39 | 23 | 20.8% | _ | _ | FCI questionnaire | 55 | 7 | |||
Metze 2007 | 77 | 16 | _ | _ | 19.5% | X | _ | _ | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
Feng 2008 | 40 | 11 | _ | _ | 27.5% | _ | _ | Nocturnal penile tumescence, Doppler ultrasonography | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Odutola 2012 | 151 | 21 | 30 | 1 | 34.4% | _ | _ | Sexual functioning questionnaire | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Vallier 2012 | 187 | _ | _ | 48 | 25.7% | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Harvey-Kelly 2014 | 80 | 25 | _ | 14 | 48.7% | X | _ | FSFI, EQ5D | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Ceylan 2015 | 26 | 26 | _ | 100% | X | 14 | 12 | |||||
Guan 2015 | 120 | 115 | _ | _ | 95.8% | X | _ | _ | 16 | 34 | 47 | 18 |
El-Assmy 2016 | 58 | 42 | _ | _ | 72% | X | _ | _ | 6 | 6 | 19 | |
Ismail 2016 | 26 | 10 | _ | _ | 38% | _ | _ | Majeed, Hannover | _ | |||
Pandian 2017 | 20 | 15 | _ | _ | 75% | X | _ | _ | _ | _ | 8 | 7 |
Duramaz 2019 | 95 | 13 | 9 | 23 | 47.4% | X | X | FSFI | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Fanjalalaina Ralahy 2019 | 48 | 16 | _ | _ | 33.3% | X | _ | _ | 6 | 4 | 6 | |
Total | 1364 | 366 | 39 | 120 | 39.3 (±24.6)% | 9 | 1 | 9 | 36 | 116 | 61 | 78 |