Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;73(5):656–659. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.09.001

Table 1.

Clinical features and transesophageal findings of patients referred for Patent foramen ovale closure.

Parameters Screened for PFO closure n = 88 PFO closure done n = 29
Age in years, mean (SD) 38 (11) 41 (11)
Gender, male n (%) 55 (63) 16 (55)
Indication, n (%)
Stroke 74 (84) 25 (86)
Stroke and migraine 11 (12) 3 (10)
Othersa 3 (3) 1 (3)
RoPE Score, median (IQR) 7 (6,8) 6 (6,8)
Transcranial doppler performed, n (%) 75 (85) 23 (80)
PFO present on TEE, n (%) 66 (75)
Size of PFO, mean (SD) 2 (1.4) 2.4 (1.6)
Large PFO (>2 mm), n (%) 31 (47) 16 (55)
bModerate to large shunt by TEE, n (%) 42 (52) 17 (70)
Length of tunnel in mm, mean (SD) 9 (4) 9.5 (5)
Interatrial septal aneurysm, n (%) 15 (23) 8 (28)
PFO closure - follow up in months. median (IQR) 19 (9,34)

PFO – Patent foramen ovale, RoPE – Risk of Paradoxical Embolism, TEE – Transesophageal echocardiogram.

a

Systemic embolism, migraine.

b

Moderate to large shunt was based on Soliman classification of more than 10 bubbles in a single frame within 3 consecutive heart beats on bubble contrast transesophageal echo study after entire right atrium is opacified. TEE bubble study performed in total of 80 patients.