Abstract
Transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) signalling regulates extracellular matrix accumulation known to be essential for the pathogenesis of renal fibrosis; latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 4 (LTBP4) is an important regulator of TGFβ activity. To date, the regulation of LTBP4 in renal fibrosis remains unknown. Herein, we report that LTBP4 is upregulated in patients with chronic kidney disease and fibrotic mice kidneys created by unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO). Mice lacking the short LTBP4 isoform (Ltbp4S−/−) exhibited aggravated tubular interstitial fibrosis (TIF) after UUO, indicating that LTBP4 potentially protects against TIF. Transcriptomic analysis of human proximal tubule cells overexpressing LTBP4 revealed that LTBP4 influences angiogenic pathways; moreover, these cells preserved better mitochondrial respiratory functions and expressed higher vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) compared to wild-type cells under hypoxia. Results of the tube formation assay revealed that additional LTBP4 in human umbilical vein endothelial cell supernatant stimulates angiogenesis with upregulated vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs). In vivo, aberrant angiogenesis, abnormal mitochondrial morphology and enhanced oxidative stress were observed in Ltbp4S−/− mice after UUO. These results reveal novel molecular functions of LTBP4 stimulating angiogenesis and potentially impacting mitochondrial structure and function. Collectively, our findings indicate that LTBP4 protects against disease progression and may be of therapeutic use in renal fibrosis.
Subject terms: Cell signalling, Pathogenesis
Introduction
Extensive lines of evidence implicate transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) signalling in lung fibrosis, neoplasm, cardiomyopathy, diabetic nephropathy (DMN), and inflammation, correlating with disease severity in all cases [1]. Thus, understanding the mechanisms of TGFβ activation and TGFβ-related signalling is relevant to developing therapeutic strategies for systemic diseases with major public health impacts. TGFβ acts ubiquitously as a cytokine, playing a crucial role in the synthesis of extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules, contributing to fibrotic disorders and regulating the immune system [2]. In addition, it influences cellular growth, differentiation, and proliferation at various stages of development and maintains tissue homeostasis during adulthood [3]. Latent TGFβ binding proteins (LTBPs) are a group of matrix proteins with important and complicated functions in the ECM. LTBPs directly facilitate TGFβ action through several mechanisms. TGFβ molecules are secreted as dimers, binding via strong non-covalent interactions to their dimeric propeptide, the latency-associated peptide (LAP). The TGFβ-LAP complex represents a small latent complex (SLC), while a tri-partite complex, known as the large latent complex, comprises an LTBP molecule bound to SLC via disulfide bonds [4]. LTBPs mediate targeting of latent TGFβ complexes to ECM structures, a process essential for TGFβ storage and activation, as well as downstream signalling. Thus, LTBPs represent potential regulators of fibrosis in different tissues.
Renal fibrosis is characterized by the abnormal accumulation of ECM, with TGFβ1 as the central mediator, inducing increased matrix protein synthesis and inhibiting matrix degradation [5]. Post-translational regulation of TGFβ1 signalling is a highly relevant aspect of renal fibrosis. LTBPs include four different genes, LTBP1, LTBP2, LTBP3 and LTBP4, where a deficiency of each results in various discrete phenotypes in human [6]. However, as potential regulators of the TGFβ pathway, the role of LTBPs in renal fibrosis remains unclear. One member of the LTBP group, LTBP4, can only bind to TGFβ1, not other TGFβ family members [7], highlighting its potential importance in fibrosis progression.
LTBP4 plays a significant role in elastogenesis and is expressed as two major isoforms, namely long (LTBP4L) and short (LTBP4S) variants synthetized from the same gene by alternate promoter and exon use [8]. Patients with biallelic LTBP4 mutations have a congenital disorder with a defective elastic fibre network, autosomal recessive cutis laxa type 1C (ARCL1C). The clinical manifestations of ARCL1C are diverse and include craniofacial anomalies, lax skin, and abnormalities in visceral organs, including the lung, heart, kidney, bladder, and gastrointestinal system [9, 10]. Genetic deletion targeting both Ltbp4 isoforms in mice produces severe neonatal lethality [11], while mice lacking the short Ltbp4 (Ltbp4S−/− mice) replicate the major human phenotype with pulmonary emphysema [11] and, thus, represents a widely accepted animal platform for understanding the pathogenesis of dysregulated LTBP4/TGFβ signalling. Herein, we created a renal fibrosis model in an Ltbp4S−/− mouse in an attempt to investigate the mechanisms underlying LTBP4/TGFβ signalling and elucidate the impact of LTBP4 on the pathogenesis of renal tubular interstitial fibrosis (TIF).
Methods
Human specimens
Human renal biopsies derived from a normal individual and a patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD) diagnosed with DMN, were purchased from ProteoGenex (Inglewood, Ca, USA). Renal tissue samples were collected from six additional patients with DMN (n = 3) or glomerular nephritis (n = 3) through our institution and were assessed by immunohistochemistry to detect LTBP4 expression. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee C of National Taiwan University Hospital (IRB number is 202101074RINC) and was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from the participants.
Antibodies
The antibodies used in the study were: rabbit polyclonal antibodies against fibronectin (immunofluorescence staining (IF): 1:100, western blot (WB): 1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich #F3648; St. Louis; USA), collagen I (WB: 1:1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific #PA5-95137; Waltham; USA), cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31, IF: 1:100, WB: 1:1000; Abcam #ab28364; Waltham; USA), 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE; immunohistochemistry (IHC): 1:50; Abcam#46545; Waltham; USA), dynamin-1-like protein (DRP1; WB: 1:1000, Cell Signalling#8570; Danvers; USA) and heat shock protein (HSP60;WB: 1:1000, Cell Signalling#12165; Danvers; USA); mouse monoclonal antibodies against α-SMA-Cy3 (IF: 1:100, WB: 1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich #C6198; St. Louis; USA), vimentin (WB: 1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc6260; Dallas; USA), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA; WB: 1:1000, IF: 1:100;; Thermo Fisher Scientific #MA5-13182; Waltham; USA), VEGFB (IF: 1:20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc80442; Dallas; USA), mitofusin-2 (MFN2; WB: 1:1000, Abcam#ab56889; Waltham; USA), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; WB: 1:10,000; Thermo Fisher Scientific #MA5-15738; Waltham; USA); and goat polyclonal antibodies against LTBP4 (WB: 1:800; R&D Systems #AF2885; Minneapolis; USA).
Cell culture
Cells were obtained from Bioresource Collection and Research Center (BCRC, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC). The human proximal tubular cell line HK-2 cultured in Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium: nutrient mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12, HyClone; Marlborough; USA) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone; Marlborough; USA) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air. Hypoxia was induced by incubating cells for 48 h in a humidified chamber (SCI-tive, Baker Ruskinn; Maine; USA) at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 1% O2, 5% CO2 and 94% N2. Wherever indicated, HK-2 cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1 (Mock) or pcDNA3.1/LTBP4 (LTBP4; OHu23640D, Gene Script; NM_001042545.2; Piscataway; USA) using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen; Carlsbad; USA) to overexpress LTBP4 protein. The rat kidney fibroblast cell line (NRK-49F) was cultured in DMEM medium (HyClone; Marlborough; USA) supplemented with 5% FBS at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were cultured in EGM-2 medium (LONZA; Basel; Switzerland) supplemented with 10% FBS in collagen-coated T25 and T75 flasks.
Co-culture of HK-2 and NRK-49F cells
HK-2 cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1 (Mock) or pcDNA3.1/LTBP4 (LTBP4) using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen; Carlsbad; USA) to overexpress LTBP4 protein. Two days post-transfection, HK-2 cells were seeded on the Transwell inserts (Corning; NY; USA) and transferred to wells containing NRK-49F cells. On day 4, RNA was harvested from NRK-49F cells and subjected to reverse transcription–quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).
Animals and genotyping
Ltbp4S−/− mice were a generous gift of Daniel B. Rifkin and were previously described [12, 13]. The genotypes of the offspring from intercrossing heterozygous Ltbp4S+/− mice were determined by multiplex PCR. The primer sequences were forward primer 1, 5′-GGCTCATGCTTGAATGTTTCAG-3′; forward primer 2, 5′-ATCATGCAAGCTGGTGGCTG-3′; reverse primer, 5′-CCAATCTTGCTTCTTTGCTGAGC-3′.
Unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) in mice
Animal experiments were conducted following standards and procedures approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Care and Use of the National Taiwan University College of Medicine. All procedures were carried out in accordance with institutional guidelines for animal experimentation. The C57BL/6 mice and Ltbp4S−/− mice (8–9-weeks old; eight to ten per experimental group) were used for establishing the UUO model. The left kidneys of the mice were exposed through a midline incision under sterile conditions; the ureter was then dissected and securely tied at two places with 6.0 silk sutures. To prevent volume depletion, 0.1 ml saline was administrated into the peritoneal cavity. The midline incision was closed, and the mice were returned to their cages with free access to food and water. As a control, sham surgery was performed the same way as UUO without tying the ureter. On the day indicated, the mice were euthanized and the left kidneys from UUO and sham-operated mice were collected for protein extraction, RNA isolation, and histological evaluation.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from NRK-49F cells, HUVECs, HK-2 cells using RNeasy Mini Kits (Qiagen; Germantown; USA), and 1 μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using SuperScript IV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen; Carlsbad; USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting cDNA was used as a PCR template. mRNA levels of genes were determined by quantitative real-time PCR with SYBR Green Real-Time PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham; USA) using the CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad; Irvine; USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. GAPDH was used as an internal control. Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the comparative Ct method formula (2−ΔCt). Primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table S1.
Library preparation and RNA-sequencing
HK-2 cells were transfected with Mock (n = 1) or LTBP4 (n = 1) using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen; Carlsbad; USA) to overexpress LTBP4 protein. Two days post-transfection, RNA was extracted from HK-2 cells by the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen; Germantown; USA). All procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer’s protocol for library preparation and RNA-sequencing. Library constructions for all samples were used with Agilent’s SureSelect Strand Specific RNA Library Preparation Kit for 150-bp Paired-End sequencing on a Solexa platform. The sequence was determined using the sequencing-by-synthesis technology with the TruSeq SBS Kit. Raw sequences were obtained from the Illumina Pipeline software bcl2fastq v2.0, and we generated 20 million reads per sample. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed on hallmark pathways to assess the functional enrichment associated with LTBP4 transfectants.
Tube formation assay in HUVECs
HUVECs (1 × 104) in a 25 μl cell suspension were mixed with 25 μl of growth factor-reduced Matrigel (Corning; NY; USA). Fifty-microliter aliquots were spotted in quadruplicates onto a 24-well plate. After polymerization, spots were covered with designed media samples. Media samples were collected with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis; USA) after treating HEK293T, Mock-transfected HEK293T, and LTBP4-overexpressing HEK293T cells overnight in serum-free media. Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter units (Millipore; Billerica; USA) were used to concentrate media samples. The 1:100 diluted condition media with EGM-2 media were changed every day, and after 48 h, cells were labelled with Calcein AM green dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham; USA). Nine images per spot were captured using confocal microscopy (ImageXpress Micro Confocal, Molecular Devices; San Jose; USA). Tubulogenesis was analysed using ImageJ software. Experiments were independently repeated a minimum of three times.
Measurement of the number of vessels
Microscope fields were observed at a magnification of ×400 and the number of vessels staining positive for CD31 in a single field were counted. The next field was selected randomly by picking the view after four field widths. This process was repeated and vessel counts were obtained for ten random fields. The median value was calculated for each specimen and expressed as count per high-power field (hpf). One observer, blinded to patient details and outcomes, performed the main analysis. A second observer independently counted the number of vessels using the same technique to assess interobserver variability. Furthermore, additional sections from three of the specimens were stained on a different date in order to assess the reliability of the staining methods.
Measurement of mitochondrial function
Mitochondrial function was measured using a Seahorse flux analyser (Agilent; Santa Clara; USA) according to the procedure provided by the manufacturer. LTBP4 transfectants were seeded in an XF24 cell culture microplate at 1 × 104 cells per well. Mitochondrial function was evaluated by determining OCR and ECAR at baseline and after the addition of oligomycin (1 µM), FCCP (1 µM), and rotenone/antimycin A (0.5 μM). The experiments were repeated independently a minimum of three times with three technical replicates per experiment and biological replicates.
Western blot analysis
Mouse kidneys and cells were lysed in T-PER (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham; USA) or lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS), respectively, supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on ice for 30 min. Protein concentrations were determined by the BCA Protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham; USA). Forty micrograms of protein per sample were mixed with Laemmli’s sample buffer and boiled for 10 min. The samples were separated on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore; Billerica; USA). The blotted membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat milk in TBST (Tris-buffered saline/0.2% Tween 20) for 1 h at room temperature (RT) and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were then washed in TBST and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at RT. Immunoreactive signals were detected using the chemiluminescent reagent ECL (Millipore #WBLUR0500; Billerica; USA). The experiments were repeated independently a minimum of three times.
Immunohistochemical staining
Antibody staining was performed on serial 4 μm sections after microwave-mediated antigen retrieval in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) by heating for 5 min. Peroxidases were quenched with 3% H2O2 for 10 min. Slides were blocked in blocking buffer (2.25% glycine, 0.5% saponin, 1% BSA in PBS) for 10 min at RT, followed by incubation with an anti-LTBP4 antibody for 16 h at 4 °C. Detection was performed using the REAL EnVision Detection System (Dako; Jena; Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sections were counterstained with Mayer’s haematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis; USA), dehydrated, and protected by cover slips. Images were captured in digital format using an OLYMPUS DP72 microscope.
Immunofluorescence staining
Kidney tissues were fixed in 10% formalin neutral-buffered solution (Wako; Osaka; Japan), dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Antibody staining was performed on serial 4 μm sections after microwave-mediated antigen retrieval in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) by heating for 5 min. Slides were blocked in blocking buffer (2.25% glycine, 0.5% saponin, 1% BSA in PBS) for 10 min at RT, followed by incubation with primary antibodies for 16 h at 4 °C. Detection was performed using appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated with Alexa-488 or Alexa-594 (Invitrogen) for 1 h at RT. Sections were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis; USA) for 5 min at RT and protected by cover slips. Images were captured in digital format using an OLYMPUS DP72 microscope. For computer-assisted densitometric image analysis, at least ten random fields per section were captured for quantitative assessment of the area positive for staining using the StrataQuest software (TissueGnostics; LA; USA).
Electron microscopy
Kidney cortex tissue samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2.5% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer. The proximal tubular cells were photographed and examined under a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1400, JEOL, MA, USA).
Angiogenesis Arrays
Dot blotting against 55 angiogenesis-related proteins was performed using Proteome Profiler Human Angiogenesis Array Kit (ARY007, R&D Systems; Minneapolis; USA) based on the manufacturer’s instructions (200 µg of cell lysate per sample was loaded onto the membrane).
Microarray data set
We analysed LTBP4 expression in data deposited in a public repository; it can be accessed through ArrayExpress: E-MTAB-2502.
Statistical analysis
All data were analysed for their parametric distribution using Shapiro–Wilk test. Student’s t-tests were used for between-group analysis, whereas Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare differences between two independent groups when the dependent variable was nonparametrically distributed. A two-sided P value < 0.05 was considered significant for all statistical calculations. Data processing was performed with GraphPad Prism version 9.0c for Windows (GraphPad Software Inc.; San Diego; USA).
Results
LTBP4 expression is associated with TIF in mice and humans
In ongoing efforts to understand the biological functions of LTBP4 in kidney fibrosis, we first measured Ltbp4 expression in the kidneys of mice subjected to UUO to elucidate the biological roles and molecular mechanisms of Ltbp4 in TIF. We observed that LTBP4 was upregulated along with TIF progression (Fig. 1A, B, p < 0.01) and gradually increasing fibrotic markers, including collagen deposition (Fig. 1A, C, p < 0.05), fibronectin (Fig. 1A, D, p < 0.05), and alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA; Fig. 1A, E, p < 0.05). Immunoblotting analysis identified a positive correlation between LTBP4 and fibrotic markers, including collagen I, fibronectin, and vimentin (Fig. 1F). In human donors with CKD, diagnosed with DMN and glomerular nephritis, LTBP4 was found to be upregulated in kidney tissues compared to that of patients with healthy kidneys (Fig. 1G), indicating that LTBP4 expression was associated with human TIF. Given that LTBP4 was upregulated in fibrotic kidneys, we analysed LTBP4 expression in E-MTAB-2502 dataset form Array Express and consistently, it showed significant upregulation (Fig. 1H, p < 0.05).
Ltbp4 deficiency aggravates TIF in mice with UUO
We next investigated the functional consequences of upregulated LTBP4 in fibrotic kidneys and conducted UUO in wild-type (WT) and Ltbp4S knockout (Ltbp4S−/−) mice. Ltbp4 deficiency led to more severe TIF when compared to WT mice (Fig. 2A–C; Fibronectin: p < 0.01; α-SMA: p < 0.05), suggesting a protective role for LTBP4 in this fibrotic process.
Transcriptomic analysis of human proximal tubule (HK-2) cells overexpressing LTBP4
To ascertain the molecular mechanisms resulting in LTBP4-medicated renal protection in TIF, we performed transcriptomic analysis of LTBP4-overexpressing or empty vector (Mock) HK-2 cells. Differentially expressed genes between LTBP4-overexpressing and Mock cells were significantly enriched in immune response, cell differentiation, and epithelial cell-associated phenotypes (Fig. 3A), suggesting that LTBP4 could maintain tubular homeostasis and alleviate the mesenchymal phenotypes of fibroblasts. Gene signatures related to interferon response and angiogenesis were enriched in LTBP4-overexpressing HK-2 cells (Fig. 3B, C, Supplemental Table S2). In contrast, gene signatures involved in MYC targets were reduced in HK-2 cells overexpressing LTBP4 (Supplemental Fig. S1 and Supplemental Table S3).
We initially examined whether interferon-γ (IFN-γ) was controlled by LTBP4 to verify the results of the transcriptomic analysis. Upregulated IFN-γ expression was observed in the kidneys of WT and Ltbp4S−/− mice subject to UUO when compared to levels in the sham group. However, there were no obvious difference in IFN-γ expression between WT and Ltbp4S−/− mice (Fig. S2), suggesting that LTBP4 deficiency did not affect IFN-γ production in renal fibrosis.
Next, we assessed the effect of epithelial LTBP4 on myofibroblast differentiation using an HK-2 cell and NRK-49F rat fibroblast co-culture system (Fig. S3A). Overexpression of LTBP4 in HK-2 cells (Fig. S3B) upregulated the epithelial marker E-cadherin and downregulated the mesenchymal markers fibronectin and collagen I in NRK-49F cells (Fig. S3C). Thus, LTBP4 antagonized the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, a process that plays a major role in renal fibrosis development.
LTBP4 induces angiogenesis in HUVECs
As LTBP4 was found to exert significant control over angiogenesis in transcriptomic analysis, we next sought to determine whether LTBP4 functionally impacts tubulogenesis in HUVECs, presenting a widely used platform for in vitro studies of the vasculature and angiogenesis. We generated LTBP4-overexpressing HEK293T cells (Fig. S4) and collected supernatants as conditioned media. HUVECs were treated with conditioned media collected from Mock- or LTBP4-overexpressing HEK293T cells (Fig. 4A), after which the areas of tubulogenesis were evaluated. Additional LTBP4 in cell culture media significantly promoted tube formation in HUVECs (Fig. 4B and C; p < 0.001). To clarify affected angiogenic molecules in HUVECs, we compared the expression of angiogenesis-related markers between cells treated with and without conditioned media. Proteomic profiling revealed that additional LTBP4 treatment stimulated several angiogenesis-related factors in HUVECs, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), angiopoietin-2, and endothelin-1 (Fig. 4D). To understand the molecular impact of LTBP4 on angiogenic signals, we investigated the expression of VEGFs and vascular endothelial growth receptors (VEGFRs) in HUVECs with additional LTBP4 treatment as well as normoxic and hypoxic LTBP4-overexpressing HK-2 cells. Expression of VEGFB (p < 0.05) and VEGFR, including VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively), were upregulated in the presence of conditioned media with LTBP4 in HUVECs (Fig. 4E). In addition, LTBP4 was found to stimulate VEGFA expression in hypoxic HK-2 cells. (Fig. 4F; p < 0.05) but VEGFB expression (Fig. 4G) was not affected significantly.
Ltbp4 deficiency reduces angiogenesis in injured renal tissues
In injured renal tissues from mice subjected to UUO, on day 5 post-surgery, increased angiogenesis was observed (Fig. 5A, B; p < 0.01), however, the response was blunted in Ltbp4S−/− mice, suggesting that the increased angiogenesis in mice subjected to UUO was mediated, at least in part, by LTBP4. In injured tissue, angiogenesis was stimulated by various proangiogenic mediators, including VEGFA and transient upregulation of VEGFA expression was detected during renal fibrosis progression (Fig. S5A–B; p < 0.05). Furthermore, in injured renal tissues, a higher expression of the angiogenic markers, VEGFA and cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31), was observed in WT mice compared to Ltbp4S−/− mice at UUO day 5 (Fig. 5C–E; p < 0.05). Additionally, VEGFA and VEGFB expression were reduced in Ltbp4S−/− mice at UUO day 5 (Fig. S5C and D).
LTBP4 preserves the mitochondrial functions in vitro
There is compelling evidence that mitochondrial function is associated with angiogenesis [14]. To determine the effect of LTBP4 on mitochondrial functioning upon encountering cellular stress, we compared the mitochondrial bioenergy profile in hypoxic LTBP4-overexpressing and Mock-transfected HK2 cells. Results from Seahorse metabolic measurement showed that oxygen consumption rate (OCR) associated with basal respiration, maximal mitochondrial respiration, and ATP production were significantly enhanced in LTBP4-overexpressing cells (Fig. 6A; p < 0.01). Similarly, the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) associated with basal glycolysis was enriched as well.
LTBP4 deficiency shortens the mitochondrial length of renal proximal tubular cells in vivo
Herein, we examined whether LTBP4 regulated mitochondrial function in mice TIF. Mitochondrial morphology, length, and number were evaluated in the tubular cells of WT and Ltbp4S−/− mice with or without UUO. Interestingly, mitochondrial length (Fig. 6B, C; p < 0.05), but not abundance, (Fig. 6B, D) was significantly reduced in Ltbp4S−/− mice subjected to UUO when compared to those in WT mice with UUO.
We also determined whether LTBP4 is involved in the pathophysiology associated with changes in mitochondrial fusion and fission. To this end, we studied the protein expression of mitofusin 2 (MFN2), a mitochondrial fusion mediator, and found that its expression tended to be reduced in Ltbp4S−/− mice on day 5 after UUO (Fig. S6A, B), and was significantly reduced on day 1 after UUO (Fig. S6D, E and F; p < 0.05). This indicated that a decrease in MFN2 exacerbates tubular damage in Ltbp4S−/− mice, with subsequent enhancement of mitochondrial fragmentation, which might contribute to kidney fibrosis. Meanwhile, dynamin-related protein 1, a mitochondrial fission mediator, was not significantly different between the WT and Ltbp4S−/− mice (Fig. S6A, C). To determine whether altered mitochondrial structures and concurrent mitochondrial dysfunction were developed along with enhanced oxidative stress, we performed IHC staining for 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) and noted its expression after UUO to be significantly higher in Ltbp4S−/− mice compared to WT mice (Fig. 6E, F; p < 0.01).
Discussion
We showed that LTBP4 was upregulated in fibrotic kidneys compared to healthy individuals by accessing data in a public repository and in human renal tissue. Using a UUO model in Ltbp4S−/− mice, we showed that LTBP4 protects against TIF in CKD via non-TGFβ-related signalling, enhancing angiogenesis and altering mitochondrial structure. Reduced angiogenesis, abnormal mitochondrial morphology and enhanced oxidative stress may act in concert to induce more severe fibrosis in Ltbp4S−/− mice. Here, we also found that LTBP4 could preserve better mitochondrial functioning after hypoxia in vitro. LTBP4 is an essential regulator of the TGFβ pathway, which is known to be strongly associated with fibrosis, indicating that it enhances renal tissue resistance to damage and plays a potentially protective role during CKD progression.
Renal fibrosis is essential for CKD development and progression, and the major mediator is TGFβ1. Several studies have focused on the inhibition of TGFβ1 and its downstream molecules for the treatment of renal fibrosis [15]. TGFβ1 suppresses ECM degradation and stimulates the deposition of ECM, which either directly or indirectly controls TGFβ activation [16]. LTBPs are important regulators of TGFβ activation, and only LTBP4 binds to the TGFβ1 isoform, though inefficiently [13]. LTBP4 can also enhance TGFβ signalling in cells by stabilizing TGFβ receptors on the membrane [17]. We overexpressed LTBP4 in human proximal tubule cells, the major targets of acute and chronic renal injury, and transcriptomic analysis revealed multiple processes associated with altered protein expression, such as angiogenesis and energy usage. The complexity of LTBP4 functions might provide a novel target for the treatment of renal fibrosis.
Reduced angiogenesis, attributed to a lack of LTBP4, has been reported in pulmonary interstitial fibrosis with impaired alveolarization [18]. To date, the current study is the first to show the interplay between LTBP4 and angiogenesis in TIF. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that LTBP4 is related to non- TGFβ-pathways in many diseases [19]. Herein, additional LTBP4 was observed to induce tubulogenesis in HUVECs by inducing angiogenic factors, including VEGFR1, VEGFR2 and VEGFB; moreover, LTBP4 induced upregulation of VEGFA in hypoxic LTBP4 overexpressing HK-2 cells rather than VEGFB. Conversely, Ltbp4S-knockout blunted the expression of CD31, as well as the endothelial markers, VEGFA and VEGFB in mice with UUO. Thus, both gain and loss of function experiments implicated LTBP4 in mediating a protective angiogenic response in TIF. Meanwhile, VEGFB is stable and not influenced by hypoxia or growth factors [20], similar findings were observed in the current study in hypoxic HK-2 (Fig. 4G). Although VEGFB does not play a direct role in angiogenesis under normal conditions or following its overexpression, it has been implicated in the indirect regulation of VEGFA activity [21], and is associated with cell survival [22].
The downregulation of inflammatory gene expression, observed in our transcriptomic studies, may also contribute to the mitigation of TIF by LTBP4. Angiogenesis is known to be an essential component of inflammation and was shown to be significant in the pathogenesis of ischaemic and chronic inflammatory diseases. Moreover, reduced expression of VEGF has been reported in TIF [23–25]. Jonson’s group thoroughly investigated endothelial cell and peritubular capillary loss in renal insufficiency and reported that an increased VEGF expression is transient in the early stage after injury. A subsequently reduced expression of VEGF is associated with peritubular capillary loss, which correlates with the severity of interstitial fibrosis [26, 27]. Herein, we similarly observed transient upregulation of VEGF on day 1 after UUO in WT mice but this phenomenon was lack in Ltbp4S−/− mice (Fig. S5A–B). This could be a reason for a greater reduction of VEGF expression in Ltbp4S−/− mice than in WT mice on day 5 after UUO. Furthermore, VEGF might influence acute and chronic renal disease-related angiogenesis and its effects could attenuate the disease process [28–30]. In addition, angiogenesis is considered to facilitate the repair of injured tissues, and in diseases, such as glomerulonephritis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis, the delivery of angiogenesis factors and the enhanced intensity of angiogenesis can be therapeutic in accelerating recovery [28, 31]. CD31 is highly expressed on the surfaces of endothelial cells and is a member of the immunoglobulin-superfamily PECAM-1 [32]. We found reduced CD31 expression in Ltbp4S-deficient mice with TIF. This finding indicates that decreased numbers of endothelial cells and levels of angiogenic factors might contribute to a more severe fibrosis in Ltbp4S−/− mice with UUO.
In addition to the impact on the fibrotic expression profile and angiogenesis, we also observed altered mitochondrial morphology in renal proximal tubule epithelial cells. Accumulating evidence indicates that mitochondrial dysfunction and fibrosis are related [33] and some suggest that mitochondrial morphology is associated with organelle functionality, with the potential to change according to different cell conditions [34]. Alterations in mitochondrial transport and distribution are prone to induce bioenergetic impairment; however, in our in vitro study, the overexpression of LTBP4 alone did not induce ATP production nor affect mitochondrial bioenergetics (not shown), while in pre-treated renal proximal tubule cells under hypoxia environment, LTBP4 appeared to preserve more mitochondria functions. Thus, regulation of mitochondrial structure by LTBP4 may be threshold-dependent, such that reduced concentrations of LTBP4 impair mitochondrial structure, while excess LTBP4 does not increase mitochondrial function above normal levels unless cellular stress developed simultaneously. Clarification of the precise role of LTBP4 in mitochondrial structure and function, and the contribution of this mechanism to the pathogenesis of renal fibrosis will require further investigations.
While mitochondrial morphology was fragmented, increased generation of oxidative stress was detected in Ltbp4S−/− mice with renal fibrosis compared with WT mice with fibrotic kidneys. Furthermore, in vitro, excess LTBP4 promoted more ATP generation and preserved better mitochondrial respiratory functions after cellular hypoxia. These findings suggested that LTBP4 might play an essential regulatory role during cellular stress and tissue damage (e.g. fibrosis).
Certain limitations were noted in the current study. First, we did not use LTBP4-overexpressing mice to validate the results of in vitro studies. Further, for the in vitro studies, we did not perform experiments involving LTBP4-knockdown to strengthen the findings obtained with the Ltbp4S−/− mice. Nonetheless, the fibrotic mouse model offered solid evidence of the role played by LTBP4 in TIF, and LTBP4 upregulation was detected in renal tissues from patients with CKD. Thus, we believe that the results are convincing and relevant to TIF and CKD.
In summary, the results presented herein suggest that LTBP4 protects against TIF by enhancing angiogenesis, suppressing inflammatory gene expression, and supporting mitochondrial structure in tubular epithelial cells (Fig. 7). Thus, LTBP4 has multiple, cell-type-specific effects that prevent fibrosis. Biological or pharmacological upregulation of LTBP4 may offer a novel molecular approach to the treatment or management of fibrotic disorders.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank ex-colleagues, Kuo-Hsuan Chen and Pei-Yi Wang, and the staff of the Second and Seventh Core Lab, Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital for technical support during the study. We thank Dr. Reiko Inagi (The University of Tokyo, Japan) for providing human renal tissues (purchased from ProteoGenex (Inglewood, Ca, USA)). The study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 108-2311-B-002-007- & MOST 107-2311-B-002-007- to CTS), the National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Taiwan (NTUHYL 109.F006 & NTUHYL 108.F003 to CTS), and the National Institutes of Health, USA (HL090648 to ZU).
Author contributions
CTS administrated the whole study; TMJ designed the experiments; ZU reviewed the results and drafted manuscript preparation; YJH and DHWS did experiments and analysis; YCC did data collection; WCL reviewed EM images; CTS and JWH approved the final version of the manuscript.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Edited by Anastasis Stephanou
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41419-021-04214-5.
References
- 1.Akhurst RJ, Hata A. Targeting the TGFbeta signalling pathway in disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:790–811. doi: 10.1038/nrd3810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wahl SM, Chen W. Transforming growth factor-beta-induced regulatory T cells referee inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7:62–8. doi: 10.1186/ar1504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pohlers D, Brenmoehl J, Loffler I, Muller CK, Leipner C, Schultze-Mosgau S, et al. TGF-beta and fibrosis in different organs - molecular pathway imprints. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1792:746–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Todorovic V, Rifkin DB. LTBPs, more than just an escort service. J Cell Biochem. 2012;113:410–8. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Okuda S, Languino LR, Ruoslahti E, Border WA. Elevated expression of transforming growth factor-beta and proteoglycan production in experimental glomerulonephritis. Possible role in expansion of the mesangial extracellular matrix. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:453–62. doi: 10.1172/JCI114731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rifkin DB, Rifkin WJ, Zilberberg L. LTBPs in biology and medicine: LTBP diseases. Matrix Biol. 2018;71-72:90–9. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2017.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Saharinen J, Keski-Oja J. Specific sequence motif of 8-Cys repeats of TGF-beta binding proteins, LTBPs, creates a hydrophobic interaction surface for binding of small latent TGF-beta. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:2691–704. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.8.2691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kantola AK, Keski-Oja J, Koli K. Fibronectin and heparin binding domains of latent TGF-beta binding protein (LTBP)-4 mediate matrix targeting and cell adhesion. Exp Cell Res. 2008;314:2488–500. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Callewaert B, Su CT, Van Damme T, Vlummens P, Malfait F, Vanakker O, et al. Comprehensive clinical and molecular analysis of 12 families with type 1 recessive cutis laxa. Hum Mutat. 2013;34:111–21. doi: 10.1002/humu.22165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Urban Z, Hucthagowder V, Schurmann N, Todorovic V, Zilberberg L, Choi J, et al. Mutations in LTBP4 cause a syndrome of impaired pulmonary, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, musculoskeletal, and dermal development. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;85:593–605. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bultmann-Mellin I, Conradi A, Maul AC, Dinger K, Wempe F, Wohl AP, et al. Modeling autosomal recessive cutis laxa type 1C in mice reveals distinct functions for Ltbp-4 isoforms. Dis Model Mech. 2015;8:403–15. doi: 10.1242/dmm.018960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sterner-Kock A, Thorey IS, Koli K, Wempe F, Otte J, Bangsow T, et al. Disruption of the gene encoding the latent transforming growth factor-beta binding protein 4 (LTBP-4) causes abnormal lung development, cardiomyopathy, and colorectal cancer. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2264–73. doi: 10.1101/gad.229102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dabovic B, Robertson IB, Zilberberg L, Vassallo M, Davis EC, Rifkin DB. Function of latent TGFbeta binding protein 4 and fibulin 5 in elastogenesis and lung development. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230:226–36. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reichard A, Asosingh K. The role of mitochondria in angiogenesis. Mol Biol Rep. 2019;46:1393–400. doi: 10.1007/s11033-018-4488-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen L, Yang T, Lu DW, Zhao H, Feng YL, Chen H, et al. Central role of dysregulation of TGF-beta/Smad in CKD progression and potential targets of its treatment. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;101:670–81. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.02.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Robertson IB, Rifkin DB. Regulation of the Bioavailability of TGF-beta and TGF-beta-Related Proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8:a021907. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a021907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Su CT, Huang JW, Chiang CK, Lawrence EC, Levine KL, Dabovic B, et al. Latent transforming growth factor binding protein 4 regulates transforming growth factor beta receptor stability. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:4024–36. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bultmann-Mellin I, Dinger K, Debuschewitz C, Loewe KMA, Melcher Y, Plum MTW, et al. Role of LTBP4 in alveolarization, angiogenesis, and fibrosis in lungs. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2017;313:L687–98. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00031.2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Su CT, Urban Z. LTBP4 in health and disease. Genes. 2021;12:795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.Enholm B, Paavonen K, Ristimaki A, Kumar V, Gunji Y, Klefstrom J, et al. Comparison of VEGF, VEGF-B, VEGF-C and Ang-1 mRNA regulation by serum, growth factors, oncoproteins and hypoxia. Oncogene. 1997;14:2475–83. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lal N, Puri K, Rodrigues B. Vascular endothelial growth factor B and its signaling. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018;5:39. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang F, Tang Z, Hou X, Lennartsson J, Li Y, Koch AW, et al. VEGF-B is dispensable for blood vessel growth but critical for their survival, and VEGF-B targeting inhibits pathological angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:6152–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813061106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Song YR, You SJ, Lee YM, Chin HJ, Chae DW, Oh YK, et al. Activation of hypoxia-inducible factor attenuates renal injury in rat remnant kidney. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2010;25:77–85. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sun D, Feng J, Dai C, Sun L, Jin T, Ma J, et al. Role of peritubular capillary loss and hypoxia in progressive tubulointerstitial fibrosis in a rat model of aristolochic acid nephropathy. Am J Nephrol. 2006;26:363–71. doi: 10.1159/000094778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Burt LE, Forbes MS, Thornhill BA, Kiley SC, Chevalier RL. Renal vascular endothelial growth factor in neonatal obstructive nephropathy. I. Endogenous VEGF. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2007;292:F158–67. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00293.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kang DH, Joly AH, Oh SW, Hugo C, Kerjaschki D, Gordon KL, et al. Impaired angiogenesis in the remnant kidney model: I. Potential role of vascular endothelial growth factor and thrombospondin-1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:1434–47. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V1271434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kang DH, Anderson S, Kim YG, Mazzalli M, Suga S, Jefferson JA, et al. Impaired angiogenesis in the aging kidney: vascular endothelial growth factor and thrombospondin-1 in renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;37:601–11. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.22087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kang DH, Kanellis J, Hugo C, Truong L, Anderson S, Kerjaschki D, et al. Role of the microvascular endothelium in progressive renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:806–16. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V133806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kang DH, Hughes J, Mazzali M, Schreiner GF, Johnson RJ. Impaired angiogenesis in the remnant kidney model: II. Vascular endothelial growth factor administration reduces renal fibrosis and stabilizes renal function. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:1448–57. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V1271448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Reinders ME, Rabelink TJ, Briscoe DM. Angiogenesis and endothelial cell repair in renal disease and allograft rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:932–42. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005121250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Iruela-Arispe L, Gordon K, Hugo C, Duijvestijn AM, Claffey KP, Reilly M, et al. Participation of glomerular endothelial cells in the capillary repair of glomerulonephritis. Am J Pathol. 1995;147:1715–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gumina RJ, Kirschbaum NE, Rao PN, vanTuinen P, Newman PJ. The human PECAM1 gene maps to 17q23. Genomics. 1996;34:229–32. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang S, Tan X, Chen Y, Zhang X. Postconditioning protects renal fibrosis by attenuating oxidative stress-induced mitochondrial injury. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2017;32:1628–36. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Filadi R, Pendin D, Pizzo P. Mitofusin 2: from functions to disease. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:330. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0023-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.