Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 30;12:609646. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.609646

Table 6.

Different view convolutions comparison on BraTS 2019 validation data (125 cases).

Dice Hausdorff 95 (mm)
ET WT TC ET WT TC
Axial view (331) 0.671 ± 0.308 0.868 ± 0.106 0.763 ± 0.208 8.81 ± 16.62 11.88 ± 19.45 11.95 ± 17.28
Coronal view (313) 0.651 ± 0.325 0.858 ± 0.119 0.758 ± 0.210 9.46 ± 16.93 14.25 ± 19.26 12.35 ± 18.29
Sagittal view (133) 0.645 ± 0.325 0.874 ± 0.099 0.757 ± 0.208 8.05 ± 14.56 12.96 ± 21.27 11.39 ± 16.67
Ensemble three views 0.676 ± 0.318 0.886 ± 0.075 0.774 ± 0.212 6.74 ± 13.19 9.08 ± 15.16 9.49 ± 14.66

The online evaluation platform computed metrics. The Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance (mean ± SD) are reported. ET, enhancing tumor, WT, whole tumor, TC, tumor core.

Bold values highlight the best results for each metric.