Table 1. Morphology and Surface Chemistry Trends of the Electrode Materialsa.
| surface
chemistry trends |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| geometry and electrode type | morphology | fiber dimensions | roughness estimation (PyC as the planar reference)b | sp2 | sp3 | sp | COOH andketone/aldehyde | Id/Ig ratio | contact angle (hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity) |
| forest-like (CNF/ta-C) | vertically aligned fibers with Ni particles attachedc | 1 μm length, 50–75 nm diameter, and 200–500 nm spacing between fibers | 18 X | √ | √ (considerable) | 1.1 | θadv = 86 ± 2° θrec = 32 ± 2° (weakly hydrophilic) | ||
| spaghetti-like (MWCNT/ta-C) | porous network of intertwined and curved fibers | 10 μM length and 5–10 nm bundle diameter | 100 X | √ | √ | 1-highly defective | θadv ≈ 86–120° θrec < 40°d (hydrophobic) | ||
| planar (PyC) | flat surface (RMS 1.2 ± 0.6 nm)16 | 1 X | √ | √ | √ | √ (negligible) | 3.17 | θadv = 60 ± 1° θrec = 22 ± 2° (moderately hydrophilic) | |
Surface chemistry studies (XAS and Raman spectroscopy) and morphology have been previously reported: CNF/ta-C and MWCNT/ta-C19−21,23 and PyC.16,22
Roughness estimation was performed by double-layer capacitance studies.
Some chunks of fibers and smaller structures between the main fibers are also observed.
Contact angles were not stable for MWCNT/ta-C due to highly non-uniform surface.