Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 7;2021:4894881. doi: 10.1155/2021/4894881

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Comparison of the effects on spatial learning and memory test in rats from different groups. (a) (A–E) The swimming track of different groups of rats in spatial learning training; (F–J) the swimming track of different groups of rats in the spatial memory test. (A) and (F) from the sham group; (B) and (G) from the 2VO group; (C) and (H) from the 2VO+Vehicle group; (D) and (I) from the 2VO+Cell group; (E) and (J) from the 2VO+Cell+EA group. (b) Comparison of the average escape latencies of five groups in four days of spatial learning training (one-way ANOVA, F = 12.354, P < 0.001). (c) Comparison of the swimming time in target quadrant of five groups in the spatial memory test (one-way ANOVA, F = 22.159, P < 0.001). (d) Comparison of the frequency of crossing in the platform of five groups in the spatial memory test (one-way ANOVA, F = 8.281, P < 0.01). Values are mean ± SEM (N = 5 rats/per group). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001.