Table 3.
Structural equation model.
| Direct effect | |||||
| Knowledge hiding | Job performance | ||||
| Gender | 0.06 | 0.02 | |||
| Age | 0.00 | −0.01 | |||
| Education | 0.08 | 0.12 | |||
| Role conflict | 0.16* | ||||
| Job insecurity | 0.28*** | ||||
| Cynicism | 0.32*** | ||||
| Knowledge hiding | −0.19** | ||||
| Mediating effect of knowledge hiding | |||||
| β | SE | ||||
| Role conflict → Knowledge hiding → Job performance | −0.04* | 0.02 | |||
| Job insecurity → Knowledge hiding → Job performance | −0.02* | 0.01 | |||
| Cynicism → Knowledge hiding → Job performance | −0.03** | 0.02 | |||
| Moderating effect of transformational leadership | |||||
| Standardized regression weight on DV | |||||
| IV | MOD | DV | IV | MOD | IAT |
| Role conflict | Transformational Leadership | Knowledge hiding | −0.04 | 0.36* | −0.13** |
| Job insecurity | Transformational Leadership | Knowledge hiding | 0.32* | −0.02 | 0.02 |
| Cynicism | Transformational Leadership | Knowledge hiding | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
Notes: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
DV = Dependent variable; IV = Independent variable; MOD = moderator; IAT = interaction term.