Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 1;8:698521. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.698521

Table 1.

Comparison of gene supplementation and CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing strategies.

Feature Gene Supplementation CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing
Can be used to treat autosomal recessive disorders
Although currently restricted by gene size

No restrictions of gene size but limited by gene editing loci
Can be used to treat dominant-negative conditions
Can be used to treat autosomal dominant diseases
Can correct pathogenic variants
Modifies disease without altering the genome
Causes host immune response
Risk of genotoxicity from overexpression
Potential off-target effects, such as cleavage or genetic modification of DNA regions other than the intended target site